Posted on 06/07/2017 8:38:21 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
blah blah rip on Jesus’s mom - how about we bring back Michelle Obama - will that make you happy.
which is a statement that hardly anyone could disagree with.
You replied to that however, with;
I was not specifically claiming anyone had.
The rest of your commentary is not worth addressing in detail. You are in no position to give orders, or to tell me what to think, say, or do.
How about yourself, though, leave off ENTIRELY making FR religion forum thread all about individual persons HERE?
Seriously.
"rip on Jesus's mom"
And I did that...how?
I said that she was not God, and that she could not save anyone.
In your own opinion, are either of those two conditions incorrect?
If not, then logically enough, we are in agreement as for those two 'conditions', and I was not criticizing, "ripping on" as you put it, "Jesus's mom".
What business is it of yours, or anyone’s, where Melania’s parents live?
You are obsessed with “Lifestyles of the Trump Family”.
Get lost...you look for reasons to attack me
go make your what business is it of yours on these kinds of threads
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3558877/posts?q=1&;page=1
btw, what business is it of yours on whether Melania was raised and baptized a Catholic..that IS why you clicked on this thread
totally agree with you Jane...
Seems she is on every post today!!!
Its always the same thing when people go after Catholics - and its absolute BS. And by the way the Bible tells us Jesus does listen to his mom -
You should read that part about wedding at Cana, where she (the party) runs out of wine - son do your thing. Its not my time. Son, make the wine. Okay mom. I'm sure its in the Chick tracks you must have seen it.
WOW what a lie. Count how many threads there are today..and how many posts...and then how many I have written
Why lie like that?
Not just today. Every DAY!
That is a lie.
For example, there are twenty threads on my front page at the moment. I have posted on two of them.
And i Have not posted to every thread...or every post today.
What a ridiculous accusation
Nonsense!
YOU post on a public forum...with almost ALL of your posts negative towards Trump family (look at your tagline) and your posts, for reference...yet, you can’t take replies?
I RARELY post to you. I’ve noticed that when folks DO post to you, you tend to get VERY sensitive and snap back at them.
Maybe you should stick to fashion posts. Your drive-by, antiTrump posts are tiring and have been noted by many, for some time, now.
Maybe YOU should just give it a rest, and stop whining when you get called out...by several.
It just gets old.
Nothing positive - with the exception of a few fashion threads/posts sprinkled in, as cover.
So why is Melania’s religion ANY OF YOUR BUSINESS???
“YOU post on a public forum...with almost ALL of your posts negative towards Trump family (look at your tagline) and your posts, for reference...yet, you can’t take replies?”
This is such a lie.
Give me links to all of my posts today that are negative towards Trump’s family.
PSSST...even the post today about Melania’s parents is not a negative. Why do you pretend that it is?
Here is one of the few posts I made about Trump’s family today
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3558762/posts?page=30#30
How is agreeing with Trump tightening things up ...a negative.
Your posts about me are a lie.
I do post negative things. That is not a lie. But to say all that I post is negative is a flat out lie.
Nor is the post on this thread that generated your personal attack on me a negative. There is nothing wrong with that post.
Instead, you said,
And you know this -- how? You know my motivations could be put in the terms you chose to identify those -- how? Based on what?
I "went after Catholics" you say? No, I did not. What I did was speak towards religious beliefs, and perceptions. That is different.
In the past I've seen comments deleted for reason of including scatological reference, including that very abbreviation. What you said about myself, and my alleged motivations -- approaches being in that sort of realm. You said it, you used the term, not me.
I have read that already, and more than once, including having gained further understanding regarding the setting. One thing for a certainty is that the texts do not indicate that Mary said as you put it; son do your thing in those words, or even implicitly that being what Mary was saying. TO arrive at that interpretation is to impose upon the text anachronistically Mariology that developed only much later, centuries after time of Christ, and his chosen apostles.
Materials from that source have long been banned from FR. Mentions of that source are for the most part also banned. Using that as place where someone is alleged to (accused of?) having gotten their info -- if that is what you were intending, is also out-of-bounds for a variety of reasons.
I see this was posted in "bloggers and personal" rather than "religion".
I guess you can use the term "B.S." here. Then again, if so, I could fire that right back, aimed squarely at your own comments/portion of a comment.
It would be best to not aim things at persons themselves. But hey, I can do it too --if you were to insist upon it.
Please, don't tempt me.
Do you ever ask your mother, or other people, to pray for you?
Yes?
That means you think your mother is God, right?
Do you ever ask your mother, or other people, to pray for you?
Yes?
That means you think your mother is God, right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.