Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Old And Busted: There Was No Wiretap. New Hotness: Trump Declassified Sensitive Information
RedState ^ | March 5, 2017

Posted on 03/05/2017 7:37:56 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

This is becoming funnier by the minute. Yesterday morning, Trump’s assertion that he and his campaign had been the subject of a wiretap ordered by the Obama administration was being laughed at. By midday the story was a denial that Obama himself had ordered an wiretap on Trump’s personal phone. By afternoon a consensus had developed that Trump was, in fact, the target, directly or indirectly, of surveillance. This morning on the talk shows the existence of the wiretap is treated as “of course it happened.” And now we’re at the stage where “Trump did a very bad thing by talking about it.” Via ABC News With tweetstorm, Trump may have exercised exclusive declassification authority.

If – through his tweets – Trump revealed secret government information about surveillance, he exercised an exclusive privilege afforded only to the president as the ultimate declassification authority.

If any other government employee had single-handedly made such revelations they could see prison time for potentially damaging U.S. national security, a former official with intimate knowledge of the government secrecy policies told ABC News.

“It’s an extremely serious offense,” ABC News Contributor Matt Olsen, who is the former director of the National Counterterrorism Center and a former FBI counsel, explained.

“Anyone who would reveal the existence of a wiretap would violate federal law,” he said. “It is against federal law to disclose the existence of a wiretap, whether that wiretap is for criminal purposes or intelligence purposes.”

Right now the only people in the world denying that electronic surveillance took place of either Trump, himself, or his campaign are Republicans who hate Trump. And James Clapper. But this is James Clapper we’re talking about.

It is sort of touching to see a news agency that has trafficked in all manner of leaked classified information that would get the leaker a long prison term suddenly concerned about national security. But it is hard to take it very seriously. The real point of this is to try to make Trump’s mention of the wiretap an issue. Up until now the Obama people have had the best of both worlds. They were able to leak about Trump and felt very safe that their own vulnerabilities would remain hidden behind security classification. If Trump wants to know how this movie ends he need look no further than Bush refusing to declassify information about the existence of Iraqi chemical weapons and the fact that US troops had been injured by them while allowing the media and Democrats to continue to falsely claim that there were no chemical weapons in Iraq.

In fact, the only reason this whole Trump-Putin-Russia thing has metastasized is because the evidence and even the allegations are surrounded in secrecy. If Trump wants this to go away he’s eventually going to have to present the intelligence community with an ultimatum: either you make the evidence public, or I do. Because, as the article accurately states, Trump holds the authority to declassify anything that he wishes to declassify.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Computers/Internet; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: espionage; intelligence; obama; shadowgovernment; softcoup; trump; wiretap; wiretapping
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
President Carter did that by mentioning certain Keyhole (satellite) systems when I was in the intelligence game.
1 posted on 03/05/2017 7:37:56 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
media is getting the vapors, oh dear!


2 posted on 03/05/2017 7:40:00 PM PST by drewh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Anyone who would reveal the existence of a wiretap would violate federal law,” he said. “It is against federal law to disclose the existence of a wiretap, whether that wiretap is for criminal purposes or intelligence purposes.”

Can it be mentioned without penalty after someone else mentions it first ?
Like assuming the NYTimes article of 1/19/2017 is true ?
3 posted on 03/05/2017 7:42:13 PM PST by stylin19a (Terrorists - "just because you don't see them doesn't mean they aren't there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If this is the latest defense of Obama’s lawlessness, that it is unlawful to disclose that you were targeted by lawlessness by the government, then the media is forever lost.


4 posted on 03/05/2017 7:43:09 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think he should and go back and look at Iraq while you are at it.


5 posted on 03/05/2017 7:43:38 PM PST by dila813 (Voting for Trump to Punish Trumpets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

It would be epic justice if an editor and writer at the SLIMES went to prison for this.


6 posted on 03/05/2017 7:44:42 PM PST by doug from upland (Hey, traitor Democrats. I have a tree. I'm sure another FReeper has a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Aw baloney!

If the government wiretapped me and I found out about it, I would shout it out to the world. The First Amendment of the Constitution says that I can.


7 posted on 03/05/2017 7:44:46 PM PST by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“If any other government employee had single-handedly made such revelations they could see prison time for potentially damaging U.S. national security”

Unless he was a Democrat.


8 posted on 03/05/2017 7:45:48 PM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Perhaps Clapper denied it because he was not allowed to confirm. That appears to be the law. Only the Prez can declassify.


9 posted on 03/05/2017 7:45:59 PM PST by doug from upland (Hey, traitor Democrats. I have a tree. I'm sure another FReeper has a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Your Vapors image just about wraps it up. That was a fun little piece. Appreciate the post, 2nd Division


10 posted on 03/05/2017 7:46:36 PM PST by StAntKnee (Add your own danged sarc tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think we’ve reached the point where every political figure and media hack inside the Beltway would rather eat a swimming pool full of horse crap than admit that Trump was objectively truthful in one of his hilarious Twitter messages.


11 posted on 03/05/2017 7:47:24 PM PST by Alberta's Child (President Donald J. Trump ... Making America Great Again, 140 characters at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
“Anyone who would reveal the existence of a wiretap would violate federal law,” he said. “It is against federal law to disclose the existence of a wiretap, whether that wiretap is for criminal purposes or intelligence purposes.”

But, Hillary did that exact thing in her October 31 tweet.


12 posted on 03/05/2017 7:47:53 PM PST by Baynative ( Someone's going to have to pay for these carbon emissions, so it might as well be you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Apparently President Trump is the only one that can expose the truth to the American People about Obama’s misdeeds as President!


13 posted on 03/05/2017 7:48:15 PM PST by aynrandfreak (Being a Democrat means never having to say you're sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

OUR president needs to crack down very hard and very soon. No mercy.


14 posted on 03/05/2017 7:48:37 PM PST by WENDLE (Watch this on John McCain. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO0mHEJyC3Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meyer

That may be true, unless you signed the document required to work in the intelligence field.


15 posted on 03/05/2017 7:49:06 PM PST by Texas Fossil ((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: meyer
"If the government wiretapped me and I found out about it, I would shout it out to the world. The First Amendment of the Constitution says that I can."

The restriction applies to those who have security clearance. Even if they see a secret revealed in the media, they cannot confirm it or talk about it.

16 posted on 03/05/2017 7:49:35 PM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

Hillary tweeted it on October 31 2016
By this logic she broke yet another law by disclosing the wiretapping on Trump and did so a week before the election in attempt to damage her opponent

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/03/hillary-tipped-off-trump-wiretap-tweeted-one-week-prior-election/


17 posted on 03/05/2017 7:49:44 PM PST by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good thing Hillary never released any secret intelligence.


18 posted on 03/05/2017 7:49:54 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So let’s see: it’s OK if the media/deep state leaks inside, private, or classified info to the press... as long as you don’t mention the use of wiretapping. OK, got it!


19 posted on 03/05/2017 7:50:43 PM PST by drierice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Actually it was Hillary last year who tweeted out the existance of the wiretap...


20 posted on 03/05/2017 7:50:54 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson