Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Headshrinkers inundated with Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferers
Canada Free Press ^ | 02/25/17 | Matthew Vadum

Posted on 02/25/2017 7:49:00 AM PST by Sean_Anthony

Because he’s Hitler, or something

We’ve heard about the unethical, unhinged psychiatrists and psychologists who diagnose President Donald Trump as a crazy person.

Well, now psychoanalysts’ offices are being flooded with bed-wetting, paranoid left-wingers who stay up at night expecting to be dragged away by the Trump Death Squads. These patients complain about panic attacks, insomnia, and an inability to concentrate all because Trump-is-Hitler-or-something.


TOPICS: Government; Health/Medicine; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: derangementsyndrome; psychiatrists; psychologists; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: MIchaelTArchangel

You must make sure the car has had an oil change, new tires and a full tank of gas or the cure doesn’t work.


21 posted on 02/25/2017 11:42:24 AM PST by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Clutch Martin
So.... All these people with disorders will not be able to possess firearms?

My copy of the second amendment does not bar crazies, or even free felons, from owning and carrying weapons.

22 posted on 02/25/2017 12:12:08 PM PST by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Building the Wall! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

“My copy of the second amendment does not bar crazies, or even free felons, from owning and carrying weapons.”

I understand that. I have also heard that psychiatrists are asking questions of people with depression regarding whether or not they own weapons or rather firearms. And I understand from a friend of mine that the CCW database has been used in some states by psychiatrists to ascertain whether people are endangering themselves. And yes I know that this is not constitutional but from what I’ve heard it is being none. my

In the later 2000’s the military put out forms for signature documenting whether or not members of the armed forces owned firearms and whether or not we had committed acts of domestic violence thereby exercising the affidavit indicating such acts of domestic violence or other things posed a risk or threat. And as such documenting tendencies towards violence which wad then followed up with firearms ownership or access.

My brother-in-law indicated that he has been asked by doctors whether or not he was a Firearms owner. So be that as it may and the fact that you and I both understand the Constitution there are things being played out at a state level, and federal level that is very questionable to Second Amendment rights.


23 posted on 02/25/2017 12:33:13 PM PST by Clutch Martin (Hot sauce aside, every culture has its pancake, just as every culture has its noodle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson