Posted on 02/23/2017 6:25:02 PM PST by Sean_Anthony
Those “democrats” sure can move quickly into full racist mode if you’re a minority and pi$$ them off.
Reebok is printing up shirts to support her even as we speak. /uber sarcasm
Tut, tut, guess SOMEBODY isn’t so big on DIVERSITY, after all..!
Gosh, I’m SO surprised.
“> Isn’t this what McConnell did to Warren, more or less?
Yes. However, the article also points out that when Ronald Reagan was being honored a year or tow ago, no effort was made to stop a DemocRat representative from trashing him. So, at a minimum, there is massive hypocrisy.”
Except Sen Nguyen was telling the truth, and Fauxcahontas was violating US Senate Rule XIX.
“can they legally do this. seems to me this is s state sponsored censorship.”
Not so different than Harry (Dirty) Reid “filling the tree.”
I waited on Tom Hayden once when I was a waitress at the Conservatory café at the Mayflower Hotel at Central Park West in New York City in the early eighties. At that time that hotel was next-door to Paramount Studios. Jane Fonda was doing a movie for Paramount so she stayed at that hotel with her husband Tom Hayden. Tom was in the café with a playboy bunny. Truly. He was bragging that he was married to Jane Fonda. She didn’t believe him so he called the rooms and asked her to come down and show her face. She did! She came down to the café and he showed her to the playboy bunny. Disgusting. Mean mean man. Entitled. Maybe a friend of WJC, you think?
Good om Janet for standing her ground!!
While I realize your comment is in jest, here is a fun fact..... 4.5 million Californians voted for Trump.""
To all those here who love to bash CA, how many people in your state voted for Trump? I bet the results will surprise you....
North East that is.
The Democrats can dish it out, but they can’t take it.
Tom Hayden was a piece of filth, like his soul-sister Jane Fonda.
Tom Hayden and his wife Jane Fonda named their son Troi after Nguyen Van Troi, a Vietnamese terrorist executed in 1964.
>> Except Sen Nguyen was telling the truth
Yes she was. What I don’t know is whether California Senate has a rule comparable to Rule XIX. If not, then she should have been allowed to speak. If so, then the Democrats are hypocrites for allowing Reagan bashing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.