Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/21/2017 1:42:46 PM PST by bananaman22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: bananaman22; Army Air Corps

Drill Baby, Drill!


2 posted on 02/21/2017 1:44:42 PM PST by KC_Lion ("I'm a believer that you don't need a title, and you don't need an office to make a difference"~S.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Channeling legendary sportswriter and novelist Dan Jenkins, ‘hey Abdul, better learn to pan fry them cobras’.


3 posted on 02/21/2017 1:47:05 PM PST by Stevenc131
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Has there been any speculation of Trump opening ANWR for drilling?


4 posted on 02/21/2017 1:49:49 PM PST by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Cut off all pipeline flow of gas and oil products withing a 100 mi. radius of the NYC Governor’s Mansion, now surrounded by a high wall/fence.


5 posted on 02/21/2017 1:52:40 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Thank you, Texas oil men. You are the BEST!


6 posted on 02/21/2017 1:54:12 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

The price should be fairly stable going forward as cost of production will control since the Saudis have probably learned their lesson.

So, just riding those dividends here.


8 posted on 02/21/2017 2:13:27 PM PST by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Not good for the oil price.


9 posted on 02/21/2017 2:20:55 PM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Net oil imports: 5.0 million bpd
Anticipated rise in production (by 2022): 3.5 million bpd.
Net oil imports, 2022: 1.5 million bpd.
Petroleum use should be pretty steady, based on past decade and future fuel economy.

Pretty close to energy independence.


10 posted on 02/21/2017 2:24:30 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22
This was an interesting tidbit:

Furthermore, the actions of such giant "vendor-financing" providers as China (seen best in the case of Venezuela, where China continues to provide Caracas with much needed funds in exchange for far below market oil deliveries) remain unpredictable, and may afford these non-core OPEC nations just the funds they need to also steal market share from Saudi, Iraq and UAE.

While Venezuelans starve, the socialist regime is kept alive by China. The sweetheart oil deal with China means that there's even less petroleum revenue to hold up the Venezuelan economy. Zimbabwe, here we come!

11 posted on 02/21/2017 2:29:20 PM PST by AZLiberty (A is now A once again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22
breakeven costs for key major U.S. plays now stand around the $55/bbl mark.

That is an average. Many wells are below that level. The Sauds acted as if the average was a hard line that cut through everybody. It is the nature, too, of free market capitalism, that costs of production decline continuously. If costs are too high to produce at a certain level, the Sauds win temporarily by undercutting it. SOme companies bankrupt. Others cease production. But other comanies are buying up the bankrupts' assets and they and the survivors are working hard to reduce costs and increase efficiency (same thing) and go back into production when they have become profitable again. Saudi oil is a state monopoly and ultimately cannot compete in the free market so long as the Saudi government receives the profit. Social and military spending (and corrupt diversion) will always rise to the level of the revenue and becomes painful to reduce. With the government in the USA backing off, the the Sauds are stuck with an overhang which will come down slower(voluntarily) than the fall in revenue. We win. Sauds lose.

13 posted on 02/21/2017 2:37:46 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Right now just about every major oil producer or services company is LOSING money.

For those in the know, I have a question.

What will change that, and will it change in light of oil prices staying the same or going lower?

Appreciate your well qualified opinion.


17 posted on 02/21/2017 3:05:10 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22
And then we have Gasoline Glut in New York Has Traders Sending Cargoes Abroad
19 posted on 02/21/2017 3:23:06 PM PST by Oatka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bananaman22

Shale 2.0 could drive costs down to $5 - $20/bbl. http://www.nextbigfuture.com/search?q=shale+2.0

We have multiple Saudi Arabias worth of shale reserves, and if big computing allows anything near these prices for production, we will export a LOT even at $50/bbl., let alone a higher price.


20 posted on 02/21/2017 4:22:40 PM PST by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson