What Milo does well, for advancing conservative and traditional principles, lights fires of hope.
What Milo does darkly, painting monologues and conversations with what he does in bed with body parts in the nastiest of terms, punctuating it with self-deprecating laughter, is a scandal.
Milo is two different individuals. Two codes of moral practice.
For myself, the word “twisted” expresses that condition very well. It does not reflect a lack of mercy, if you read my post. I see him as a sympathetic person, who is also a genius... sadly morally and actively twisted.
I guess Rita, that if I came upon that type of monologue, I would pass it by. He does not post that type of material on general interest forum but if that sort of material appears on homosexual forums I think that is c/w what appears at those sites.
Frankly I was turned off to Milo because of his flamboyance. When researching him for this controversy I was ashamed that I had not read more of his essays before dismissing him for being crude since he really is passionate in defense of children’s rights, woman’s rights, freedom of speech etc, both well reasoned & well sourced & researched.
I think further that American’s are more prudish than Europeans and see scandal where others see frank discussion of sexual matters.