Posted on 02/14/2017 12:08:41 AM PST by nodwam
Tucker Carlson exposed Yvette Felarca, a national organizer for BAMN a radical activist group. BAMN was one of the biggest backers behind the UC Berkeley riots that shut down Milo from speaking.
“A fascist is someone who’s organizing a mass movement that’s attacking women, immigrants, black people, other minority groups in a movement of genocide,” Felarca answered when asked to define a fascist.
Felarca said her group would fight “by any means necessary,” referring to the group’s name BAMN, to “shut down” fascists.
“What do you mean by shut down?” Carlson asked. “What if I want to keep talking? What if I’m saying something you find appalling, but I’ve got a First Amendment right. I’m an American. What would you do?”
(Excerpt) Read more at hiddenamericans.com ...
Terrible performance by Carlson.
1. He did not challenge her made up definition of fascism.
2. He didnt ask her “What right do you have to deny someone their right to free speech and to PHYSICALLY ATTACK THEM because you think they are a fascist?
3. He didn’t ask her “By your rules if someone thinks YOU are a fascist would be OK for them to attack you if they don’t like what you are saying”. In addition, if someone decides you are a fascist should they be able to get you banned from teaching?
I read The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich three times, and these are tactics the socialists (communists, fascists, socialists - all the same beast) used against the Weimer Republic and against each other to shut down rallies and speeches. The same playbook used by thugs to over through free countries. Again - dangerous times.
Open carry will become a lot more commonplace if something like that happens. We might even start seeing people shopping in Walmart, etc., with an AK or AR or some kind of hunting rifle slung across their backs.
I look forward each evening to Tucker Carlson politely inviting so called progressives to make fools of themselves. What is frightening and sad is that so many young people have been exposed to her vindictive foolishness in the classroom.
Some here have not figured out Tucker yet.
I await with baited breath for your explanation of what I haven’t figured out...meanwhile, Carlson missed a golden opportunity to flay a blithering idiot, who needs flaying, on the air...
Yes, Irish, I did watch it. Why would you say I didn’t?
I was commenting purely on Tucker Carlson, not the psycho guest. People like her used to be called “hard-core radicals” but I’m not sure what you call such a dangerous beast today.
I have no doubt she could put a gun against someone’s head and pull the trigger, without a qualm, simply over ideology.
Why isn’t she arrested and under charges?
Are you serious? She got her job back under a First Amendment argument, but now is working against that very first Amendment. This is why we hate liberals and elitists. One law for them and one for us. Isn’t that the essence of why British citizens revolted against the King.
Yes, Irish, I did watch it. Why would you say I didn’t?
I said it because in no way shape or form did Tucker Carlson give this imbecile ‘the business’ to which you alluded...he whiffed mightily on an opportunity to eviscerate her, which is the only thing her kind can understand...
I have no doubt she could put a gun against someone’s head and pull the trigger, without a qualm, simply over ideology.
which is precisely why Carlson needed to show up with the gloves off, and not simply mail it in...
Just goes to show counter protesters shouldn’t appear except in groups of three or more. A cameraman, ànd several men prepared to throw elbows and use their steel toed boots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.