Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ColdOne

A judge in one District Court is not bound by what a judge in another District Court in some other part of the country thinks.

A judge in a District Court IS bound by decisions of the judges on the Appeals Court in the circuit in which his District Court is located. And of course the Judge is bound by what the Supreme Court decides.

So you often have Appeals Courts in different parts of the country coming up with different legal analyses on the same issue. If you have a split among the various Appeals Courts in different parts of the country in how they treat the same legal question, often the Supreme Court will be willing to take a case on appeal in order to resolve the differing approaches to the issue and settle the question once and for all.


7 posted on 02/05/2017 12:43:03 PM PST by Meet the New Boss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Meet the New Boss

The State of Washington is a party to this case, hence, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction.

Why the Acting Solicitor General did not go there Friday is a good question, as is the question of why this EO was issued before the DOJ team was in place.


14 posted on 02/05/2017 12:59:36 PM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson