Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62; Fai Mao

>
I believe this practice violates “probable cause”
...
The SCOTUS has already ruled on the issue. Provided their guidelines are followed, no problem.
>

SCOTUS? Well, damn, I guess there’s no argument then. *rolling eyes*


13 posted on 01/07/2017 4:49:11 PM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73

“SCOTUS? Well, damn, I guess there’s no argument then. *rolling eyes*”

Yeah, I’d agree. This is a practice that anyone should be against. I can see a cop stopping someone on the street to ask them a question but there has got to be more than gut feeling the citizen is being evasive before they can be searched or frisked. It isn’t just minorities that should be upset over this type of thing.

I can understand anyone being upset at this practice.

I don’t care if they’ve got “I’m a gang member” or “I’m a Mafia hitman” tattooed on their forehead; people shouldn’t be searched when they are just walking down the street.


14 posted on 01/07/2017 6:02:07 PM PST by Fai Mao (PIAPS for Prison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson