I never thought of that. Solid point.
I never thought of that. Solid point.
= = = = = = = = =
How about the hair on palms?
When ‘they’ started the ss marriage I figured if you and your best bud were both single, one had a nice house and the other a good pension/medical plan, why not a marriage of convenience for them?
There is no ‘law’ against dating the sex you wanted, the marriage would be for convenience - you don’t need the sex part (Having been married for 40 some years, I can (sort of) attest to once the marriage is consummated sex is more or less a back burner thing).
Is it still against the law to marry to allow another person to gain citizenship?
These idiots make all these senseless rules etc, why not cash in on them?