Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/29/2016 7:13:24 PM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Elderberry
Judge Henderson, one of the three judges on the panel that decided the motion, would have denied the emergency motion.

So I take it Judge Henderson was against it and the other two voted for it, am I reading that correctly? I wonder why they didn't list the names of the two that were for it?

2 posted on 12/29/2016 7:56:17 PM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Elderberry

You can’t be “harmed” by being denied that to which you have no rightful claim, nor by the government voluntarily avoiding Unconstitutional actions.


3 posted on 12/29/2016 8:05:45 PM PST by sourcery (Non Acquiescit: "I do not consent" (Latin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson