Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Trumps NASA With Working "StarTrek" EM Propulsion Drive --"Testing Now...
The Daily Galaxy ^ | December 20, 2016

Posted on 12/25/2016 8:46:40 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: rfp1234

Considering NASA’s attitude to nuclear power, I would think so. Hopefully, more details will be forthcoming.


41 posted on 12/26/2016 12:05:10 AM PST by tanuki (Left-wing Revolution: show biz for boring people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

It has a factor in there people aren’t dealing with yet. From what I’ve read this device is alleged to allow achieving velocities of hundreds if not thousands of miles a second. You are not going to be able to have a solar system teeming with vehicles at those velocities unless those vehicles have autodestruct mechanisms that turn them into a cloud of gas if they get within X million miles of inhabited structures or planets.

There is just to much kinetic energy to risk it. Objects with the mass of a pickup truck striking the earth at 5000 miles a second would be cataclysmic. The fastest we’ve gotten anything up to is, I believe, the voyagers at about 11 miles per second. There will have to be a whole system developed for safely moving objects around at 1%-10% C.

One thing sci-fi hasn’t tended to convey accurately (or wanted to, since it would be boring) in visual space epics is the fact that anything that is going somewhere in space at a rate remotely capable of getting there within a reasonable time is going to be going so fast you’re not going to be able to see it.


42 posted on 12/26/2016 12:06:46 AM PST by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

17 megatons of TNT. That’s the kinetic energy of a 5,000 lb pickup truck going 5,000 miles per second. But it would require twice that much energy to accelerate a 5,000 lb pickup truck to 5,000 miles per second in the first place. Science is not about to start becoming magic where that kind of energy can just pop out of nowhere. How many laws of physics do we intend on ignoring to make this phantom drive a reality?


43 posted on 12/26/2016 12:52:48 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

“If the EM drive works....”
****************************************
It DOES work...that has been established. NASA’s contribution was to determine that it also works in a vacuum. The current problem is developing an understanding of WHY IT WORKS. NOBODY (as far as I know) understands WHY it works. There are various conjectures as to why & how it works but none have yet been proven. This is the type of thing to which I hope Trump has NASA devote reallocated resources. The efforts would be far worthier than their current MASSIVE waste of resources spent trying to promote the Man-caused global warming hoax or trying to make Muslims feel better about themselves.


44 posted on 12/26/2016 12:54:05 AM PST by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

>It DOES work...that has been established. NASA’s contribution was to determine that it also works in a vacuum.

Actually we still don’t know if it does work. The amount of thrust generated is well into the experimental error range. Nor have any of the experiments designed to scale up the effect generated the expected thrust. I’ve been following the EM drive for years and so far it appears to be a bust.

I’d put no faith in Chinese claims. Chinese scientists and academics are the biggest frauds in the world.


45 posted on 12/26/2016 1:18:55 AM PST by RedWulf (Trump:Front Lines. Obama: Back Nine. Hillary:Nap Time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Oh yeah sure....I believe all the science news coming-out of that dump


46 posted on 12/26/2016 4:17:20 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That’s fine....they also say that AGW is real. When they produce a fully function engine then let’s talk


47 posted on 12/26/2016 4:18:15 AM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

Can’t help remembering a video of Kelly Ripa riding around the TV studio in a kid’s express wagon, using a CO2 fire extinguisher as her jet engine. (I still can’t believe the fire extinguisher has that much force.


48 posted on 12/26/2016 4:27:20 AM PST by Tucker39 (In giving us The Christ, God gave us the ONE thing we desperately NEEDED; a Savior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No big deal. We have reverse engineered the flying saucers, and are way ahead of the Chinese (unless Madame President sold them the blueprints).


49 posted on 12/26/2016 4:36:21 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
“If” it works, then it means our understanding of physics is fundamentally flawed. So fundamentally, in fact, that we’ll have to start over again all the way back from the dark ages.

You sound like a Y2K bug conspiracy theorist and climate alarmist rolled into one.

This sort of thing went on all throughout the renaissance. Relativity meant that Newtonian mechanics was incomplete, not fatally flawed. If this thing winds up working, it isn't free energy, it is a way to directly convert electrical energy into kinetic energy.

This effort to treat the laws of physics like holy scripture is counterproductive. This is probably why scientific progress has become stagnant. We spend our time on fairy tales like global warming (and a couple of others that even mentioning would guarantee a long and acrimonious thread) rather than real, observable science.

As soon as something interesting is observed, the first impulse is always to discount it rather than truly addressing it. Science anymore amounts to mostly defending orthodoxy. Galileo would be persecuted and rejected by contemporary scientists if he made similar sorts of unorthodox observations today, as has happened to many other real scientists who have done nothing more than report what they saw. Most "scientists" today should dress in robes and wear funny hats, it better fits their frame of mind.

50 posted on 12/26/2016 4:57:35 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
"For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". Newton's third law of motion.

EM drive isn't violating Newton's 3rd Law. EM Drive microwave energy might create micro fractures in the space vacuum, and unbinding even a microscopic fraction of the space vacuum would unleash massive quantities of energy.

51 posted on 12/26/2016 5:07:02 AM PST by Flick Lives (Les Deplorables Triumphant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: orionrising

They have had one for a few years now.


52 posted on 12/26/2016 5:26:52 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Brace. Brace. Brace. Heads down. Do not look up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

The alien reverse engineered stuff (if it exists) would be in the ultra deluxe mega sellout your country payoff package.

If anything alien is on hand, I’d like to hope the program is so hidden and obscured in the event of a krinton or the wun coming along to prevent it being sold or given away.


53 posted on 12/26/2016 5:35:13 AM PST by wally_bert (I didn't get where I am today by selling ice cream tasting of bookends, pumice stone & West Germany)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

So you seriously believe there is zero reactive force to photon emission by cascading electrons? Electrons have momentum and inertia.


54 posted on 12/26/2016 5:58:34 AM PST by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

I happen to know someone who designs and makes the geosync satellite stabilization rockets. you would be amazed at just how small the thrust nozzles are.


55 posted on 12/26/2016 6:00:08 AM PST by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Not so fast my friend! The engine may not be “reactionless” if the photons it produces are the “reaction mass”. It just doesn’t generate reaction mass by burning fuel, so it doesn’t need to carry that reaction mass along with it in a tank.


56 posted on 12/26/2016 6:45:29 AM PST by Campion (Halten Sie sich unbedingt an die Lehre!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal

On the other hand, big claims require big proof.

Lots of “impossible” things have been promised over the years, very few make it to market.

Personally I a rooting for this to be true.


57 posted on 12/26/2016 7:00:23 AM PST by dangerdoc ((this space for rent))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: phormer phrog phlyer

Now WHY didn’t I think of that!

After all, I grew up in Dorchester in the same neighborhood as Leonard Nimoy, so I should have known!


58 posted on 12/26/2016 7:02:22 AM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

Oh..those pesky, old, s-l-o-w impulse engines.

Good in a pinch, though!


59 posted on 12/26/2016 7:03:08 AM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder

I am beginning to think I can cure a rainy day! :-)


60 posted on 12/26/2016 7:04:18 AM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson