Well ok!
If the release of all these records are subject to the specific approval of the recorded individual, why did Zero need to subject himself to the questions and ridicule to sign an EO as his first act of his “transparent” administration to seal all his past, subject to a felony charge???
That would be terrible if it actually happened but it is fake news.
In 2001 George W. Bush issued Executive Order #13233 which placed stricter limits on access to presidential papers. Apparently a lot of people, including historians and members of congress complained about this.
Obama's first executive order #13489, revoked Bush's order #13233 and basically returned to a rule on presidential papers established by the Reagan executive order #12667.
You can read all about this here where you can even find links to the exact text of these executive orders.
All of these executive orders apply only to papers generated during a presidential term and have nothing to do with the kind of records a president would have built up in his earlier life such as transcripts, passports, a birth certificate, etc.
I haven't read every word of these executive orders, but I'm guessing that there is nothing in any of them concerning felony charges.