Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

The directive is a a bureaucratic maneuver to prevent real reform.
1 posted on 11/26/2016 10:57:02 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

It is a start. DJT will handle the details in January.


2 posted on 11/26/2016 11:00:24 AM PST by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

My thoughts exactly, DoD is trying to prevent Trump from taking action. Hopefully he will see through this and set things straight. Otherwise, if something happens in the future, he’ll get blamed for inadequate protection. Let service members and anyone legally authorized to carry concealed weapon to do so. Period. Limit this only when absolutely necessary, but not traveling to/from or around bases, in most facilities, etc. Maybe say, unless there is immediate armed presence, everyone has right to be secured with their own arms.


3 posted on 11/26/2016 11:11:26 AM PST by Reno89519 (Drain the Swamp: Replace Ryan & McConnell; Primary Lyn' Ted and others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

It’s another example of Trump affecting change before he’s even taken office.

Don’t worry about this blocking real reform - any action Trump wanted to take on day one can still be taken. This is a face saving gesture - they want people to think it was their idea...

Actually, this is one of the most effective methods of persuasion - to let someone thing it was their idea....


4 posted on 11/26/2016 11:12:57 AM PST by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
The directive is a a bureaucratic maneuver to prevent real reform.

Agreed. What if you are the E6 in charge of a recruiting center in, say, Eastern Tennessee and some of your guys don't own a personal weapon? Troops should be able to carry their issued weapon either on base or at a designated work location.

(Recognizing that this could be awkward for the 13 Bravo types and some others the carrying of personal weapons should still be permitted.)

5 posted on 11/26/2016 11:19:50 AM PST by InABunkerUnderSF (Proudly deplorable since 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

This misses the mark by a long shot. This doesn’t so shiite for me on my way to and from a federal reservation as a civilian.


7 posted on 11/26/2016 2:28:52 PM PST by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

In the military, if the wording is “may issue”, then there will not be any significant number of commanders who will give OK.

There is no up-side for the commander allowing carry. The commander will be held totally responsible for anything bad which happens. Any incident involving any person who they have OK’ed to carry, will likely be career-ending for the officer who signed off on their permission to carry. Hence, there will be NO permission to carry.

It needs to be a “SHALL issue” environment, where successful completion of a standard NRA firearms training course, plus absence of specific disqualifications, SHALL authorize the soldier to carry on base.

And it will need to be made clear to commanders, that there will be definite downsides to impeding CCW, such as the commander being held responsible if there is an incident where troops are killed while defenseless.


9 posted on 11/26/2016 3:42:29 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
The directive is a a bureaucratic maneuver to prevent real reform.

Perhaps, but they know a new CINC is the CINC and may just be trying to get a handle on the concept and how to deal with it w/o folks going nuts.

11 posted on 11/27/2016 2:27:56 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson