Charles M Blow
Posted on 11/24/2016 7:04:36 AM PST by FreedomUS
Charles M Blow recently wrote a hateful piece against president elect (basically hindering Trump’s efforts for national unity).
Charles M Brown: No, Trump, We Can’t Just Get Along
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/opinion/no-trump-we-cant-just-get-along.html
Who is this race baiter and inflammatory “writer” of left liberal New York Times? Here is a glimpse:
He cheered the “truth” (as he claims it to be) of Hillary horroific “basket of deplorable” smear on so many millions of decent Americans.
Charles M. Blow About the ‘Basket of Deplorables’ - The New York Times
“What Clinton said was impolitic, but it was not incorrect”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/12/opinion/about-the-basket-of-deplorables.html
He falsely claimed “racism” and gave impression that only Whites can be racists...
HOW A NEW YORK TIMES COLUMNIST HURTS FELLOW BLACKS - BY DENNIS PRAGER
Charles M. Blow sees racism increaing in the age of Obama.
December 8, 2009
One must conclude that Mr. Blow wildly exaggerated, if not made it up, when he wrote that America is “inundated” with “overt racism” on the Internet (or anywhere else).
His second argument for an increasingly racist America is: “And it’s not all words and images (again, none of which I saw); it’s actions as well. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s 2008 hate crimes data released last week, anti-black hate crimes rose 4 percent from 2007...”
Wow. A 4 percent increase in anti-black hate crime.
Is that an indication of a major increase in anti-black racism in America? You decide.
According to the FBI Hate Crime statistics, in 2007, 3,434 blacks were victims of a hate crime, and in 2008, the number increased to 3,596 — an increase of 162. Given that there are about 40 million blacks in America and about 260 million non-blacks, to charge America with increasing racism based on an increase of 162 incidents of racism is absurd and morally indefensible. To put it statistically, the increase, as a proportion of the black population, was .0004 percent.
Moreover, the number itself, 3,434, is incredibly small for such a large population. And bear in mind two additional factors: One has no way of knowing how many of those 3,434 incidents were committed by non-whites, such as Hispanics; and of those 3,434 hate crimes, a total of one was murder, not one was a rape, a tiny 386 were aggravated assaults, and 1,257 were “acts of intimidation,” not acts of violence.
Only to black and white liberals, including most New York Times readers, who e-mailed Mr. Blow’s column more than almost any article in the Times, do these statistics describe a racist, or increasingly racist, society.
The column is a fine example of liberal attitudes toward blacks and whites — the latter are largely racist,
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/41138/how-new-york-times-columnist-hurts-fellow-blacks-dennis-prager
BTW
Here is problem with Ben Carson on Islamofascism:
Anti-Muslim Is Anti-American - The New York Times
23 nov. 2015 - Charles M. Blow NOV. ... The tone of anti-Muslim musings post-Paris attack has become so poisonous that it cannot portend anything positive.
“There seems to be no bottom to the cesspool of Islamophobic rhetoric coming from Republican candidates.”…. “And then Dr. Ben Carson drew a tortured parallel between Syrian refugees, who are mostly Muslim, and “a rabid dog running around your neighborhood.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/23/opinion/anti-muslim-is-anti-american.html
Blow is a Black White Hating Racist. All you have to do is follow his articles through the years.
I'm fine with this. I'm going to file this away for the next time America takes the stupid pill and votes for a 'RAT.
Here is more:
Charles M. Blow Stop Bernie-Splaining to Black Voters - The New York Times
10 feb. 2016
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/11/opinion/campaign-stops/stop-bernie-splaining-to-black-voters.html?_r=0
America Elects a Bigot - The New York Times
10 nov. 2016 - Charles M. Blow
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/opinion/america-elects-a-bigot.html
yup
-liberals, all the time
Well written.
The appropriately named Mister Blow graduated from Grambling State, a school that has a graduation rate so low that it is not even commented on when you look it up. He does NOT have a Journalism Masters Degree. He is clearly and obviously on the staff at the Times for fake phony liberal affirmative action reasons and has clearly taken the slot from a qualified writer. To justify his slot on the payroll, he probably sweeps up around the news fabrication room when they tell him to.
Blacks hate whites and will use any opportunity to attack them verbally and physically. (Simply read the number of verbal & Assaults)
Clearly, this idiot’s mind is made up and will never be convinced otherwise. Reminds me of debates I used to get into with a liberal sociology prof. We’d debate a topic, she’d box herself into a corner where she’d have to admit she was wrong. Instead, she’d throw up her hands and yell: “Well, that may be but I don’t believe it!” and she would storm out of my office.
Moral: You cannot debate with an idiot.
BLOW it out your *** Charlie, you racist biatch.
Does his middle initial M stand for me?
What liberal profess:
open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values.
Versus practice:
Political Collectness, racist, sexist, and bordering facist.
His middle name is Must.
ten bucks says blow swallows...
Wow she just stated G.E. Moore's paradox: P but I do not believe P. Moore thought these statements absurd, because they were psychologically impossible. Wittgenstein was interested in them because he though that they were logically impermissible even though they were not of the contradictory form: P and not-P.
And Grambling was founded by my three-times great uncle A.C. Lewis in the early 1900’s.
He would probably spit if he saw what passed for education these days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.