Click the Pic
Posted on 11/16/2016 6:44:51 PM PST by MtnClimber
Noam...another example of an aging commie leftover who seems never to learn a damned thing
Yeah, republicans are WAAAAAAY more dangerous than the Nazis, the communists or Isis! /heavy sarc
All I know from Chomsky I learned from the PBS BS propaganda broadcast on I USED to listen to on NPR ~ eat shit, then die!
Make America Great Again!
To someone like Chomsky human death isn't the issue. Killing people is, to him, sometimes necessary to achieve a greater good - a Marxist Paradise for example.
To Chomsky, Mao is a hero and Trump is dangerous, the most dangerous of all.
And people take this guy seriously. Sad to say.
Other gop presidents/candidates were too nice...congress is still pretty wimpy though
He is 87 years old. He might see 100.
Ha!
Perfect Fakebook fare!
Click the Pic
Darn. Must be clean livin’ or something.
Anyone who would say that is certifiable.
LOL! What a rube!
Remind me again: who was it that killed JFK?
And who caused 9/11?
I seem to have forgotten...
So, the university system that is government funded to eradicate critical thinking , teaches collectivism as a glorious purpose. Erases individual culture because we are all one.... That gives him a 100k a year salary a year to spew his crap with the other fellow traveler professors, is no threat????
Are they now all on synthetic bath salts?
They are on thier heels in panic, we need to hit them hard, beat them down to a bloody stump. We can’t let up or we will just be back here again in a few years.
Chomsky is a piece of Communist trash.
The oligarchs and their intelligence agencies. I.e., as Quigley would say, the Anglo-American establishment.
Well who’s directing the guys that are shooting the police, turning over police cars, looting buildings, and beating up Trump supporters daily over an election. I think they’re a helluva a lot more dangerous myself. Of course, that would destroy the author’s narrative...
Please give us your explanation.
Noam Chomsky is a dangerous, America loathing, ultra socialist anarchist. I think he is a Marxist. Being a linguistic scientist, he is one who hides his true identity with rhetorical trickery. We saw these Yahoos crawl out of the woodwork during the Reagan administration.
I have always found it fascinating that the Left tried so hard (and succeeded) at painting Charles Lindbergh as a Hitler supporter.
He wasn’t. The Nazis did dupe him into thinking we shouldn’t go to war against them (they gave him a tour of their air force bases, and flew bombers from base to base ahead of him so it looked like they had many times more the number of modern aircraft than they really did) but he was never a supporter or sympathizer of Nazi Germany.
Getting a little carried away there, aren’t you, Butch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
