Posted on 10/28/2016 9:53:49 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
At this point I would be happy with double secret probation!
dont be so ignernt...
This is not the time to be playing games.
I am getting a little tired of this game he keeps playing- “Oh THE NEXT ONE will have her in jail” and then “THe NEXT one..”
It’s like Lucy pulling the football out from under charlie Brown- except she keeps moving it down 5 feet.
Release what you have already- Before they kill him like they did the Kennedy’s and Brietbart, and Vince Foster and Ron Brown and anyone else who had information against the Clintons.
Trump for President.
Why do people post this crap.
Is there an agenda?
And yesterday it was posted that Assange said Hillary will win.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3485783/posts
Lots of utter garbage being posted.
Freepers, don’t be stupid, if you actually are Freepers and not people with ulterior motives.
Cuz they botched the cover up the first time!
A lot more people are gonna be paying attention if they’re told that instead of “tomorrow is Podesta batch 23”
agree....we heard this in July then in August we were told the “lead to the arrest” comment was taken out of context but now we’re back to emails leading to her arrest...
i’m confused...
What should be and what will be in our corrupt government are not the same thing.
They could have a video of her murdering Nicole Brown Simpson, and all we’d hear is that Nicole wasn’t a good enough dresser to use precious air like she did.
Do you think, she intentionally involved people OUTSIDE the foundation, so that THEY can’t comply with investigations without incriminating THEMSELVES ...(or did this unintentionally-and is capitalizing on it)?
I have no doubt there are emails out there that SHOULD put her in prison for life, but even assange seems to be unaware of just how deep the Clintons’ corruption runs and the web of willing accomplices who are caught up in it.
NO MATTER WHAT SHE HAS DONE AND CAN BE PROVEN, SHE WILL NEVER SEE THE INSIDE OF A JAIL!
The actions of the FBI and DOJ proved that.
I was wondering about that.
The guy did say that the overall info he had would lead to her arrest but I don’t recall him saying specific dumps would.
The right-wing media outlets that try and click bait everyone are the guys who generally oversell everything.
Unless....anybody seen James “I’m not a weasel!” Comey lately...?
No idea & it definitely depends on your ‘source’ .... my personal opinion on sources:
Wiki tends to be fairly reliable ... when they say they have something or will release something, they generally do. They are publishers, not actual hackers.
O’Keefe is pretty good, but his videos are not the out & out ‘bombshells’ folks want (like video of Hilly herself cursing, commiting felonies, killing babies, eating puppies) .... he has definitely taken some scalps with his videos thus far & has another one coming out.
Kim Dotcom threw out all sort of hints about the “deleted” 33K emails - told Wikileaks “you’ve got mail” which implied he’d sent them to Wiki, then posted instructions to retrieve them from the NSA. Personally, I think the NSA has them, if the FBI/DOJ wants them ... but they don’t.
“Anonymous” .... I haven’t seen them/him ever back up their mysterious videos - all talk, no action IMO.
I think dribbling the leaks out is more along the lines of allowing the drunkenHillary camp to spin and deny followed by body slams of further dumps supporting all the previous misdeeds plus new materiel. It gets much harder to deny and ignore each compounding leak. They also become more believable for all but the most fervent supporters.
Finally, in a backward way it forces the MSM to acknowledge the material instead of dismissing it all in one fell swoop.
Not without precedent. President Bill also put American servicemen in harm's way just to save his political butt:
On December 16, 1998, on the eve of the scheduled House vote on his impeachment, Bill Clinton launched a surprise bombing attack on Baghdad. As justification for this exploit, he cited the urgent threat that Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction posed to America, and the need for immediate action. Almost immediately, the House Democrats held a caucus and emerged calling for a delay in the impeachment proceedings. House minority leader Dick Gephardt made a statement: "We obviously should pass a resolution by saying that we stand behind the troops. I would hope that we do not take up impeachment until the hostilities have completely ended."
Conveniently, a delay so near the end of the House term would have caused the vote to be taken up in the next session – when the newly elected House membership would be seated with more Democratic representation, thereby improving Clinton’s chances of dodging impeachment.
The Republicans did, in fact, agree to delay the hearings, but only for a day or two. Amazingly, Clinton ended the bombing raid after only 70 hours -- once it became clear that in spite of the brief delay, the vote would still be held in the current session.
Once the bombing stopped, Clinton touted the effectiveness and importance of the mission. As reported by ABC News : “We have inflicted significant damage on Saddam's weapons of mass destruction programs, on the command structures that direct and protect that capability, and on his military and security infrastructure,” he said. Defense secretary William Cohen echoed the point: “We estimate that Saddam's missile program has been set back by at least a year.”
Whether or not one buys Clinton’s assessment of that mission, it is difficult to believe that its timing was so critical that it required commencement virtually at the moment the House was scheduled to vote on the impeachment. I think the most reasonable conclusion is that Clinton cynically deployed US military assets and placed military personnel in harm’s way for purely political reasons.
We keep hearing this. These leaks should have come out months ago and certainly before the debates. Seems kind of late in the game. Many people have already voted and/or locked in who they are voting for.
no, we are not paranoid....its time now to believe every single far flung conspiracy theory because chances are they are all true...
The Clinton’s are the most corrupt people ever to hold political office but they have fanatical supporters
They have taken over 2 billion dollars of advance money from foreign countries, large corporations , special interests and billio aires like George Soros
To take them down they need to be softened up
All of the recent disclosures have set their supporters at each others throats, their wealthy donors have been insulted and publicly humiliated and the pay for play crowed realizes that even if elected, their return on their investment will be minimal and worthless - worse, they may even find themselves being prosecuted
Hillary Clinton is now radioactive and public opinion is Finally turning against her so the next revelations should find her isolated and vulnerable
LOL... or Vlad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.