Posted on 10/20/2016 3:22:12 PM PDT by Steelfish
HILLARY CLINTON IN 2002: GEORGE W. BUSH WAS SELECTED, NOT ELECTED by Jim Geraghty October 20, 2016
It is completely irresponsible to argue that a president who reaches 270 electoral votes is not elected and legitimate, right, Hillary Clinton? Only a shameless partisan with no concern for democracy or our system of government would insist that president is not elected, long after hes taken the oath of office. Trump is insanely irresponsible to suggest that this election may be rigged and the outcome fraudulent. Why, who on earth would ever make such a charge?
At a private fund-raiser in Los Angeles for Democratic Sen. Jean Carnahan of Missouri, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton told the crowd that President Bush merely had been selected president, not elected, Newsweek reports in the current issue. Oh. Thats from October 2002.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
If Trump wins the popular vote and Hillary wins the electoral college vote
I’m sure she will step aside and recognize the will of the people!
Every Reporter out there should be asking her that exact question.
Great Post!
Hey, if it’s good enough for Bush II, it’s good enough for Clinton II.
They would ask her that ... if Hillary gave them permission to.
Does everybody forget that Al Gorp wanted the DEMOCRAT Florida Sec. State to count only his hanging chads but not Bush’s. She Agreed to do that, whichi is not an election but a selection.
The Florida dem party tried to select Gorp.
The Supreme Copurt oif the United States simply said that if you counted the hanging chads of one candidate, you have to count the hanging chad for the opponent(s).
Thats not selection, thats election.
Bush won according to electoral principles of count.
Gorp tried to get the Democrat Florida Sec. State to select him. The Supreme Court would not allow that selection, after the Dem Supreme Court of Florida would allow it.
People who listen to, enjoy, praise and have dinner with popular music stars whose publicly performed lyrics are too crude to post here are "shocked" when a guy talks somewhat crudely in private on a bus.
The people who encouraged and funded the rebels in a civil war in Syria are upset and "shocked" that children have gotten hurt in the ensuing carnage. And now they are proposing to shoot down Russian fighter planes to help reduce the hostilities in the area, after their aerial attack on the Syrian government's troops ended the last cease fire. If they hadn't attacked the Syrians and broken the last cease fire the child who they are all so upset about probably would not have been injured, since the cease fire may well have held.
Now Hillary and her allies are "shocked" that somebody might question the validity of the election process. Like Al Gore did, and John Kerry did, and as we can see now, like she did. And at least two Democrats, Al Franken and Christine Gregoire went further. Their rejection of the results of the elections they lost lead to recounts and litigation which resulted in them being elected - even though they lost initially.
I can’t wait until the election is officially called for Trump and Illary’s forced to concede.
It’ll mark the end of the Clintons as a viable political force. She won’t be healthy enough to run again in 4 years, he’ll be dead of AIDS and Chelsea will be a social and political pariah without her parents to protect her from those she’s harmed and/or offended.
And once the IRS is done with auditing their foundation slush fund we’ll probably all marvel at the scope of the corruption, even though we know it to be massive.
as real as "Hands up, don't shoot!"
*
The reason everybody forgot that fact is that it is not true. Sec. Of State Katherine Harris was a republican and cerified the vote as a win for Bush.
Bttt.
5.56mm
queen ping
almost every reporter out there is more concerned with upsetting the state
Do you remember the left saying the inauguration should be delayed for recounts?
Fox News' Jennifer Griffin is doing a good job of covering up for Hillary...it's disgusting!
Do you remember the left saying the inauguration should be delayed for recounts?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I remember it vividly, what a bunch of offensive dick heads.
They just would not accept the electoral results. They would have recounted for the entire 4 years of the first term.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.