Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton’s Felonious E-Mails
Canada Free Press ^ | 10/1/5/16 | Mike Ford

Posted on 10/15/2016 12:29:55 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony

Conversation about this being a mistake, accident, or minor error in judgment, is a flat out lie. This lie should be rolled into an obstruction of justice charge -- yet another felony

The constant “drip, drip drip,” regarding former Secretary of State Clinton’s e-mail is starting to sound like so much inside baseball. Secretary Clinton continues to stand on her statement that none of the e-mail she sent or received had classified markings. Other folks in the conversation comment that many of the e-mails Secretary Clinton wrote and received were “born classified,” at the time she wrote or received them. Director Comey’s assertion that he could not prove “intent” and therefore couldn’t charge Mrs Clinton, is garbage, pure and simple. First of all, for that particular violation, “intent” is not required. Secondly, the very existence of certain information on Mrs Clinton’s unauthorized, private server, is in and of itself, proof of intent.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: clinton; emails; felony; obstructionjustice

1 posted on 10/15/2016 12:29:55 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

All you need to say about the emails is that any honest person must conclude one of two things:

1. She was reckless and incompetent with highly classified documents which makes her unfit to be president or

2. She has been lying through her teeth the entire time about classified documents which makes her unfit to be president.

You cannot choose anything else. Either way, she’s disqualified.


2 posted on 10/15/2016 1:09:32 PM PDT by OrangeHoof ("If you cain't run yo own house, you cain't run da White House. Cain't do it." - Michelle Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof
2. She has been lying through her teeth the entire time about classified documents which makes her unfit to be president.

You cannot choose anything else. Either way, she’s disqualified.

I disagree. Your second assertion relies on the assumption that lying makes one unfit. But that is not true for Democrats - it is a resume enhancer.

3 posted on 10/15/2016 1:37:13 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Good. This is written so that more people can understand it.

Unfortunately, it still needs to be simpler for Democrat voters to understand.


4 posted on 10/15/2016 1:54:28 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

You overlooked the word “honest” in my preamble. That tends to exclude most Democrats.


5 posted on 10/15/2016 8:40:26 PM PDT by OrangeHoof ("If you cain't run yo own house, you cain't run da White House. Cain't do it." - Michelle Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

You are correct.


6 posted on 10/15/2016 9:53:53 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson