Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Germany: Man spent decades at parents' home, now in hospital
foxnews.com ^ | Oct. 5, 2016 | AP

Posted on 10/05/2016 12:48:27 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper

A 43-year-old man who lived in isolation at his parents' home in Bavaria for three decades has been taken to a psychiatric hospital and German police are investigating whether his parents did anything wrong.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: bavaria
If need be, at some point you have to shove them out and change the locks.
1 posted on 10/05/2016 12:48:27 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Foreign Clinton/Bernie supporter?


2 posted on 10/05/2016 12:51:01 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Ambtion Without Talent Is Sad - Talent Without Ambition Is Worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Foreign Clinton/Bernie supporter?


3 posted on 10/05/2016 12:52:50 PM PDT by SkyDancer (Ambtion Without Talent Is Sad - Talent Without Ambition Is Worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
From the story: "...as a boy the man went to elementary school, but then stopped attending school at 13 because he was declared unfit to attend."

Sounds like the fellow has some mental issues. Not really that shocking when someone with abnormal mental health doesn't go out much (or at all). Sounds like the parents were housing and feeding him rather than passing his expenses on to the state, so not sure why this is a public problem.
4 posted on 10/05/2016 12:59:50 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

Being a shut-in for thirty years seems to be the issue. The parents surely knew that much.


5 posted on 10/05/2016 1:04:07 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

He wasn’t a shut-in for 30 years when the school decided he was unfit to attend, so obviously at least some of his issues predated that.


6 posted on 10/05/2016 1:09:06 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

If a school said my 13 year old was unfit to attend I would find another school and a better solution than to have a shut-in for 30 years running...


7 posted on 10/05/2016 1:12:55 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

If the child was declared ‘unfit’ for school 30 years ago, where were the social workers at that time? If the adult child was checked out in the hospital and found to be well nourished, why wasn’t he immediately returned to his stable environment for follow-up in the home? The headline implies wrong-doing - are the authorities looking for a problem that isn’t there?


8 posted on 10/05/2016 1:22:22 PM PDT by blueplum ((March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
If need be, at some point you have to shove them out and change the locks.

A situation like this could very well involve some sort of chronic neuropsychiatric disorder in the person in question.It's not necessarily a question of abuse or neglect or a "failure to launch" scenario.

9 posted on 10/05/2016 1:26:44 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Deplorables' Lives Matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

I think his mental condition is called agoraphobia.


10 posted on 10/05/2016 1:28:12 PM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper
If he has mental issues that is actually is abuse.

My friend's sister in law is in her fifties, she operates at the level of an eight year old. "Shoving her out and changing the locks" would kill her. She is not capable of living on her own or living outside a very structured environment.

It sounds like the parents were doing the best they could and now the state has, as usual, stuck their noses into something that is none of their business and probably traumatized their son.

11 posted on 10/05/2016 1:32:58 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: irishjuggler

At some point, it would become a public issue. In this case, the death of the last available family/trusted caregiver.


13 posted on 10/05/2016 1:32:59 PM PDT by setha (It is past time for the United States to take back what the world took away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

14 posted on 10/05/2016 1:36:43 PM PDT by SIDENET (Tagline free is no way to go through life, son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: setha
Not really.

Most people with handicapped children or relatives have made quite careful, layered provisions for them.

15 posted on 10/05/2016 1:38:12 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: setha

The gov’t should keep their nose out of it. Obviously they guy didn’t want to leave the safety of his house and his parents’ care. Leave him alone rather than uproot and traumatize him.


16 posted on 10/05/2016 1:42:39 PM PDT by flaglady47 (TRUMP ROCKS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor; irishjuggler; Gay State Conservative
It could be schizoid personality disorder. The person is no danger to himself or others, but he's just withdrawn into his own world most of the time.

This condition has no known cause, but there are supposedly genetic links with other personality disorders and schizophrenia. It also has no known effective treatmen. Putting a person like this out of the house wold be like leaving a baby on a railroad track. Probably die quickly and badly.

17 posted on 10/05/2016 1:55:47 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47

Understood. My point was addressing the rare circumstances where a plan is nonexistent or encounters something genuinely beyond its capabilities. In any case, an ideal goal of such plans is to avoid government intervention and to remove the need for inquiry.

I am hopeful that they just apologize for bothering the family and go on their way. It’s bad enough to be disabled, it’s another to be uprooted from a familiar setting.


18 posted on 10/05/2016 2:27:25 PM PDT by setha (It is past time for the United States to take back what the world took away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: setha

*** I am hopeful that they just apologize for bothering the family and go on their way. ***

Would that be the same German Social Services that wants to terminate the parental rights of the homeschooling Christian family that, IIRC, fled to the US, but we’re slated for deportation as their request for asylum was turned down?

Don’t remember all the particulars.


19 posted on 10/06/2016 12:07:22 AM PDT by sockmonkey (Donald Trump will ban auto-correct with an Executive Order. Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson