Posted on 09/19/2016 11:15:12 AM PDT by pboyington
How many stabbings and bombings and other assorted acts of terrorist violence have to be committed in the name of Allah, before the liberals running this country learn that permitting Muslims to emigrate from countries like Somali and Afghanistan is tantamount to national suicide?
This weekend, the country was beset with Islamic terror; in once peaceful Minnesota and in Manhattan and New Jersey.
In Minneapolis, a Somali immigrant, Dahir A. Adan, 22, stabbed nine people while screaming Allah Akbar, before he was shot to death by an off-duty police officer and NRA firearms instructor, Jason Falconer.
ISIS claimed that Adan had carried out the attack in the name of the Islamic State.
Since 9/11, 97,046 Somalis fleeing civil war and Islamist extremism in their homeland have been admitted to the United States. Of those, 15,681 were resettled in Minnesota, 7,493 in Ohio, 7,179 in Texas, 6,136 in New York, 5,678 in Arizona, 4,513 in Washington State, along with smaller numbers in other states.
The vast majority of the Somali population is Muslim, mostly Sunni, and the statistics of those admitted to the U.S. as refugees reflect that: Of the 97,046 Somali refugees resettled in the U.S. since the fall of 2001, 96,725 (99.6 percent) are Muslims.
In FY 2015 Somalis were the third largest contingent of refugees admitted to the U.S. – 8,858, or 12.6 percent of the total from around the world. Only Burma, with 26.3 percent, and Iraq, with 18.1 percent, accounted for larger groups of refugees arriving in the country.
In the last five years, nearly 15,000 Syrian refugees have been brought to the United States. This number includes the 10,000 recently admitted to the country.
According to the Washington Examiner, Nearly 20 percent of the 4,600 Syrian refugees already brought to the United States were settled in the New York-New Jersey area, site of weekend bombings that reportedly could be a dry run of future terror attacks.
Why is the United States of America bringing in people from countries that are at perpetual war, people who only understand violence as a way of life and who worship at the altar of a religion that is anything but peaceful?
The Qu’ran speaks of killing infidels, aka Jews and Christians and other non-believers in nearly 73 places. Moreover, at least 35 to 50 percent of Muslim immigrants in the US want to live under Sharia Law, aka Stone Age law.
The suspect in the New Jersey and Manhattan bombings that was shot and apprehended by police this morning was identified as Ahmad Rahami, a naturalized American from Afghanistan.
What a surprise…
The globalists are trying to destabilize the West by flooding the US and Europe with millions of violent refugees from the Middle East charnel house. People like George Soros are running this sedition. Who gave this Holocaust collaborator the carte blanche to destroy Western civilization?
Doing the dirty work of the globalist elite are the liberal media and leftists in government. Liberals will punch back with their traditional pie in the sky nonsense: we have to allow these people in; for the children, even though most of them aren’t kids, but single, twenty something men whose only goals are sucking off the government tit, raping women and committing acts of terror.
People who call for sane and pragmatic procedures to stop the flow of immigrants from violent countries like Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, Somali and the rest of the Middle East hit parade are deemed racists by the left.
Liberals expect Americans to accept these random acts of Islamic terrorism as a way of life. We’re supposed to subordinate our culture, our guns and our national identity to barbarians who worship a religion that is demonic in nature. Like the political elite calling the shots in Western Europe, liberal fools like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama expect Americans to adapt to Islam and anyone who wants to preserve their national identity and more importantly, to protect their national security is a racist.
It’s pure, unadulterated crap.
If blonde Swedes were committing these acts or terror, then blonde Swedes should be banned from immigrating to the US. It doesn’t matter what you look like, it matters what you believe.
The enemy of humanity is radical Islam in all of its forms.
Not one more Muslim immigrant in this country from countries that are sanctuaries of violence and terror until radical Islam is vanquished from the face of the earth.
Not one.
For liberals the violence is not a problem. It is similar to the criminal class in the old USSR. The Communists considered the criminal class to be social allies. They kept the citizenry off balance.
The jihadis are less lethal so far than the home grown social allies.
Excellent point. Thanks.
libtards want national suicide. They don't need to change their realizations about reality
Obama considers it a fact of life that we all have to deal with. Not him or the other elites, of course. A few gays murdered here, a few marathoners there, hundreds of people murdered and maimed,... it is the price that has to be paid if we are going to have completely open borders and ultimately, a one world government. And BTW, we need to do something about those guns. /sarc.
Time to turn the badger loose on the muslims.
Trump will wipe out ISIS.
Hillary will wipe her server with a cloth and her ass with the US Constitution.
Your post goes to the core of what the U.S. citizenry is facing. A burgeoning governing class with a single minded agenda that is being accomplished in the midst of instigated social chaos.
“If blonde Swedes were committing these acts or terror, then blonde Swedes should be banned from immigrating to the US. It doesn’t matter what you look like, it matters what you believe.”
Great article, and the quote above points to an issue most problematic to the Left: 1) Some cultures/belief systems are in fact inferior and/or incompatible with the civil society, 2) The solution is for such cultures/belief systems to change or be isolated, and 3) Failing to do so creates unacceptable burdens and risks.
My life as a law-abiding, productive and contributing American is worth more than an immigrant who refuses to do likewise.
Don’t know the numbers, but there are plenty of Somalis in Calgary. Their participation rate in crimes far exceds their percentage of the population.
It is rather curious that the police have not released the name of the perp who hacked a cop with a machete at Marlborough Mall on Saturday. All the press is reporting is that ASIRT (Alberta Serious Incident Response Team) is investigating because a cop discharged his gun. Both the perp and the cop are in serious but stable condition at Foothills Hospital. They are releasing no details as to the names of the cop or the perp. Somehow I don’t suspect the perp’s name will be ‘Smith’, ‘Jones’ or ‘O’Leary’.
Depends on how much money they are making. Then it becomes a question of how much money do they make per stabbing/bombing/shooting/rape/beheading.
The question is not “why do we bring in people from regions of the world that are perpetually at war”, the question is really: “Why, despite clear evidence to the contrary, do people in various national leadership positions both in the US and other countries continue to insist that Islam is a ‘religion of peace’ and to create policy based on that view? Further, why are those same leaders persecuting anyone who contradicts either the policy or the belief [that islam is peaceful]?”
What is the benefit to those leaders in maintaining this policy of the peacefulness of islam? Is it, as many on the now-so-called “alt-right” assert, that islam is being used as a blunt instrument to demolish the cultural infrastructure of the west in preparation for imposing some unAmerican form of government? Is it that, because they truly are blind to the barbarism of raw islam, and genuinely think they’re being compassionate by not only allowing unchecked immigration but also allowing those immigrants to maintain the mores and practices they claim to be fleeing, they will somehow be viewed as enlightened and superior? To what end? Is there some other motivation?
These are questions that the “alt-right” has asked and continues to ask, and which a truly objective media would long since have been hammering the administration on.
The headline of the OP is “not one more”, but what is the implied action? Should we break out the torches and pitchforks and attempt to bring the complicit media to heel? Should we do the same to the political community? Should we ignore both, take matters into our own hands, and police the vast sea of unassimilated immigrants ourselves?
Article after article has been written about the ways the political “class” has inflicted serious damage on the US. Even disregarding whether or not such damage is willful, we the people are letting it happen, and not pushing back in any way that has been effective.
Some have even claimed that this is open conflict between the liberal Left/globalists/what have you, and the conservative right in the US, and that even though the Left has not used force, they are winning i.e. they are achieving all of their objectives, and if things continue as they are, they will win the entire “war”.
In an essay discussing “white privilege”, a researcher took the position that “white privilege” is really earned by not taking advantage of potential opportunities for self-enrichment when they would damage the communal trust. I.e. “white privilege” is being treated respectfully because most whites are polite. I hold that there is a reluctance to engage in direct opposition to the various acts of destruction inflicted by the Left because to do so is to damage the work of generations of westerners in building up that communal trust. At what point does the “alt-right” decide that the communal trust is being irrevocably damaged anyway, and that the only way to potentially preserve it is to risk breaking it themselves?
That's St. Cloud, not Minneapolis.
St. Cloud is a relatively small college town, an hour northwest of the much larger metropolis of Minneapolis/St. Paul.
offer all muslims internment camps or shipped to hellhole of choice..why is it muslims pray for a hell hole> maybe they are managed by satan?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.