Eleanor Clift, who is nearly as unappealing in so many ways as Hillary Clinton, let slip the real issue at stake, whether Hillary suffers from an underlying disease, rather than pneumonia, which would disqualify her. To obfuscate this fundamental issue, Clift writes an article about ageism and sexism rather than about Parkinson's disease or cerebral deterioration until she lets slip the quoted sentence.
Surrogates for Trump should make the production of those test results which would clarify whether Hillary suffers from an underlying disease the determinative issue. Hillary might produce very old tests which, even if showing abnormalities, will be dismissed for their age. I understand that a concussion can cause very serious aftershock problems many years later, but that is a nuance that might be lost on the electorate. Hillary might instead produce no clinical data creating an issue of transparency the surrogates (but hopefully not Trump himself) for Trump should fully exploit.
There is always the chance that in fact Hillary has no underlying condition, or no condition that it be revealed by the tests which she might release. I think the likelihood of that is slim and the downside is minimal because it only brings Hillary back to a presumably normal level of health.
