This is primarily aimed at those who are STILL angry that Jesus -- the only perfect man to walk this earth -- is not physically available to run for President! Those folks who stay home because they hate BOTH candidates need to practice these two phrases: "MADAM PRESIDENT" and "FIRST PHILANDERER"! How wonderful that you will be responsible for urinating all over the birthright YOUR parents left you but will be no more if the most corrupt pair in my lifetime get back into power! Consider cremation so your kids won't dig you up to urinate on YOUR CORPSE!!
To: Dick Bachert
2 posted on
08/21/2016 1:35:47 PM PDT by
deweyfrank
(Nobody's Perfect)
To: Dick Bachert
the stories of Dr. Franklin’s love of the freely given attentions of the ladies were legendary. As what we now call a “senior citizen” it’s doubtful that Dr. Franklin was “up” to return their affections in a more than grandfatherly manner.
Hog wash.
I’m 70 and could certainly return someone’s affections,
I’m sure Franklin could too.
3 posted on
08/21/2016 1:36:55 PM PDT by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Dick Bachert
Not philanderer, first sexual predator.
4 posted on
08/21/2016 1:40:24 PM PDT by
Lopeover
(2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
To: Dick Bachert
Don’t talk about Jesus walking on water. There are people who will just say “Proves he can’t swim”...
/S
6 posted on
08/21/2016 1:53:04 PM PDT by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway - "Enjoy Yourself" ala Louis Prima)
To: Dick Bachert
Washington was also a man who had the “eye” for the ladies.
7 posted on
08/21/2016 1:57:36 PM PDT by
crz
To: Dick Bachert
The point is to elect the best person who is interested in taking the job.
As for any other job, you hire the best candidate who is interested.
And while Trump may not be “perfect” — noting that perfection is also in the eye of the beholder, he certainly is qualified and would be pretty good and just about what we need at this point, and the alternative is horrible.
9 posted on
08/21/2016 2:13:04 PM PDT by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: Dick Bachert
They certainly weren’t perfect, but the key difference is that they had a good understanding of human nature, and knew that man was inherently flawed.
They well understood that they needed to take these imperfections into account when creating a government, so the citizens of that government would be protected from it.
Liberals don’t believe that. They believe that perfection on earth can be achieved, and they are the people to enable mankind to do just that. Their fundamental premises are deeply flawed.
11 posted on
08/21/2016 2:49:08 PM PDT by
rlmorel
(Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson