That was actually a VERY good read. Thanks.
I somewhat doubt these changes would have taken place had things been sailing along smoothly. This is simply to keep the faithful.....well faithful instead of disheartened.
I think the Conway move should help. If nothing else it will help him to target areas where a difference can be made. I’m not a Trump fan, but I find it amazing that the same people in the media who are so critical of this move are the ones who reflexively use the John Maynard Keynes quote “When the facts change, I change my opinion. What do you do?” Changing strategy, management, resource deployment in the face of a highly time constrained objective that is showing different signals is not desperation per se, it’s just saying that you are continuing to play the game, the dynamic game before you. Nothing wrong with that.
Just heard an NPR (yes I know) interview with one of Trumps campaign staffers. They just can’t let them speak. The interview is like this...
Q. “But you’re bringing someone from the racist Breitbart, does this mean Trump plans to keep being racist?”
A. “No that’s not what I said it is an individual from Breitbart, not the organization.”
Q. Yeah but Breitbart called Kristol a renegade Jew and they are divisive racists at Breitbart. Does this mean Trump will still be a racist?”
A. “No, that’s not what I said. We are bringing in new people to work for Trump.”
Q. “We look forward to your racist campaign, that’s all the time we have.”
Lewandowski was good to to get Trump out there, bigger than life and attract a following. Manafort was brought in and good for locking down the nomination. Now, Trump is looking at his messaging for the general election and is acting accordingly. The tasks have evolved as the timing and environment have.
In June, "Kunoor Ojha is the Clinton campaign's first major hire from the Sanders campaign."
In July, "Carter is the most senior Sanders staffer to join the Clinton campaign yet announced."
Or this, " Hillary Clinton's campaign is bringing on Gregory Bell, who is leaving the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, where he served as director of speechwriting for HUD Secretary Julian Castro" [What, her own speechwriters weren't good enough?]
Up until Hannity comes on, and to an extent O’Reilly who is pretty fair, from the morning until late afternoon FOX is nothing but declaring that Hillary has already won and the election is over and a landslide for Clinton, repeating the same 2 week old polls that Hillary has won by double digits and all the battleground states, constantly introducing us to the wonderful and popular third party candidates who are nothing but operatives of Jeb Bush Republican establishmebt and are all part of the “Never Trump” elect Hillary for Amnesty cheap labor agenda, almost every “news item” trying to weaken the moral of the majority of the Republican base, constantly the morning to late afternoun FOX “anchors” asking “can and will Trump shift his campaign to general election mode” meaning they want his to never criticize Hillary and act like Bob Dole and essentially concede defeat...
... in other words, these are the Jeh Bush cheap labor Republican establishment crowd who the Republican base rejected and so they want and will do everything they can to ser Trump lose and Hillrry win so they can say “I told you so, you should have voted for Jeb Bush” but they will be happy with Hillary because she will give amnesty to 40 million illegal aliens.
Trump has gotten where he is in The World O’ Business by surrounding himself with WINNERS and people that are extremely good at their jobs.
Everyone on his team so far, from his first days in, up until these changes, has played a valuable part in his success. I think they did a perfect end-run around the media on the trumped-up (sic) Manafort ‘scandal.’ LOL! Dorks.
Trump is no dummy, no matter WHAT the Enemy Media force feeds you 24/7.
Sounds about right Mr. Cain and I have never been a CEO.
Enough of political hacks and professional socialist ideologues guesstimating the "why's" of a CEO's reasons for making adjustments to strategy or actions on an ongoing basis in order to achieve goals!!!
Of course, even honest pundits and politicians in the usual political mode have trouble with that. Why???? Because they've never had a clue as to why businesses succeed or fail, and they have no government model for evaluating such a phenomenon.
Cain "gets it," and even the "progressive" ideologues like Bloomberg understand: they're just too involved in their own "turf" wars to be honest.
“A fool rarely changes their mind....a wise man often does.”
Trump is a wise man.
Adjust your brain to believe that everything - 100% - of what the media reports about Trump is false or designed to disparage his candidacy and advance the liberal agenda and Hillary.
Not some. Not occassionally.
ALL the time. 100%. Once you do it’s easy to understand what the media is doing.
And .. the word “shake-up” is incorrect .. because that word usually denotes the discharge of some personnel; there was NO DISCHARGE OF ANY PERSON .. the campaign ADDED TWO PEOPLE.
But, the media know that a large faction of people aren’t paying attention .. and when the media uses the word “shakeup”, it denotes the campaign being in disarray .. when in reality the new positions are simply to add new people and change positions around for the next push toward a ground game.
vey good article
Nice to hear from Herman Cain
I hope Herman Cain plays a big part in a Trump administration
And just to prove the point, the stupid bitch Megan McCain was on Fox just now saying “leadership changes means something is going wrong with the campaign”, based of course on her extensive 2 year history of helping with her father’s loser campaign.
Apply my principle and it is simple to see that she is attempting to damage Trump and help the enemy.
100%.
As always, Herman is spot on.
Shucks ducky
Get Pout The Vote
I do not get what the big deal is here...