Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

I’m for licensing for body hair removal - I’m for licensing of any operator who has the potential to harm the human body. Body hair removal seems like a silly thing to license but a lot of people have ended up getting nasty infections (blood infections, not just skin infections) from hair removal. I found this out when researching infections from nail salon treatments. My daughter went to a licensed nail salon (in an upscale area) for a pedicure and ended up with an infection in her big toe that didn’t respond to antibiotics. She had to have the nail removed and it may never grow back. Licensing obviously doens’t prevent harm from being done, but if obtaining a license requires the operator to pass a test about cleanliness/health issues, that’s a good thing.


15 posted on 08/17/2016 6:52:10 AM PDT by Kipp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Kipp

You do realize you destroyed your own argument don’t you?


16 posted on 08/17/2016 7:13:17 AM PDT by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson