Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: chaosagent
Just asking for someone to take an ad down is not ‘coordination’.

Actually, asking that it be taken down can be treated as coordination (control is not required), and it has been used in the past as evidence of illegal activity. Cruz could not legally do that, nor could he afford to (1) go off message to deal with an outside ad, or (2) go off message to deal with charges of illegal coordination with a PAC.

82 posted on 07/21/2016 6:27:28 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Pollster1

Actually, asking that it be taken down can be treated as coordination (control is not required), and it has been used in the past as evidence of illegal activity. Cruz could not legally do that, nor could he afford to (1) go off message to deal with an outside ad, or (2) go off message to deal with charges of illegal coordination with a PAC


Funny, but Newt certainly thought a candidate could do that 4 years ago. I can find nothing that the FEC admonished him/fined him for this.

Nor can I find that the law has changed.

So right now, I’ll take Newt’s view on this.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/gingrich-to-super-pac-fix-negative-ad-or-take-it-down/

So Cruz should have asked that the ad be removed.


84 posted on 07/21/2016 6:59:23 PM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson