Posted on 07/11/2016 11:02:35 AM PDT by IChing
She recorded the whole thing. There is no way that skank whore didn’t start recording the moment she saw the blue lights. Hell, she recorded her belt buckle for 5 minutes.
Hmmm, not my bailiwick but sounds right.
Lavish Diamond is playing for high stakes that I can tell.
I agree.
I agree. Another bizarre thing she did in the second video, the press conference, was she started bellowing “What more proof do you need?!!? What more proof do you need?!!? What more proof do you need?!!?” as she was whipping the crowd into a rabid frenzy baying for Whitney’s blood, as if her video of the aftermath proved anything.
She’s a bad actress and trying to misdirect away from the fact that she’s hiding a lot.
Whitney = whitey
If somehow they got the entire shooting from her phone (cloud?) that would be something.
She’s in over her head either way.
She’s likely playing beat the clock.
“do people without valid drivers licenses still have a state photo id...”
No doubt many do, possibly including Castile. Would persons cited repeatedly for no license, suspended license, no insurance, etc., bother to procure and carry a “Non-Driver” id? Over a large sample the odds would seem to favor “no”, but for one individual it could go either way. Let’s hope whatever agency is investigating this honestly documents everything on Castile and in the car.
Yup.
I agree. I have thought about this a lot. With so many infractions, I would be hard pressed to think he decided to get a state ID. He may have, but it doesn’t seem likely.
Any corrections will be on page 23 of the newspapers and in a ten second soundbite on MSM TV if there is any mention at all.
So irresponsible for the MSM to push a narrative that creates things like Dallas killings, even if it were true. They never put up the statistics that show more police shootings of whites than blacks.
Nor the comparative rates, in context with comparative rates of violent crime, more importantly.
She recorded *the whole thing* and only published video after the shooting.
A tool for whom?
And since you seem to have all this critical inside information how in tarnation do you know when Reynolds started her video? How do you know she videoed the actual shooting too? Why was her cell phone not immediately seized as evidence when she was handcuffed?
If what you say is true, why in hell would law enforcement handcuff and put a suspect who was just involved in a fatal police shooting into the back of a patrol unit with critical evidence still in her possession?
This was allegedly a vehicle carrying an "Armed robbery suspect" right Wulff?
How did the officers know she was not armed as well?
I really want to know these answers so take your time with your response Wulff. Appreciate it, thanks!
Btw, I know you’re butt hurt because you got your bell rung here...
However it’s was the attorney of the officer involved in the shooting who told the media it was the police who have their own audio and VIDEO of this event. If this is in fact true, they’ve had time to review the audio/video 2,000 times. And this is a one shooter investigation which should not be overly complex or difficult. I’d guess they’re dragging their feet here for some reason. I don’t know what the reason would be.
Btw, it was Reynolds attorney who publicly challenged the city/cops to release the video, same as his client did with hers.
Just pure speculation here, but if the officer really thought this was a suspect in an “Armed Robbery” this event should have never happened like it did. And I will tell you why.
Since this was a suspected “Armed Robbery” suspect, this should have been a felony traffic stop, where once the suspect vehicle stops, officers order the vehicle occupants out of the vehicle, one at a time, hands up, walk backwards towards the officers etc, etc. Most have seen the routine on TV many times. This is done for officer safety as well as the vehicle occupants.
Again, I am saying all this based on the existing media reports/video/evidence and comments from the players involved.
And you’re not the first one who attacked me personally simply because I am critically looking at what is being reported and offering my thoughts. I personally think they have some issues here.
Could I be wrong? Yes. We shall see.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.