Foreign Relations Committee, Coons has taken a lead on JCPOA. Corker and Mitch set it up for pop-ups, in support of the plot, Kinda thuggish, but what the hell, it always works. Deciding Vote > Sens. Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Bob Casey (D-Pa.) ambush artists. AINO Vote > Sen. Bob Corker, Republican hatchet man. Hang your head, Tennessee.
Rab.
1 posted on
06/25/2016 9:56:46 PM PDT by
Rabin
To: Rabin
How is Nuke-u-lure not haram?
2 posted on
06/25/2016 9:57:55 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(auto spelchk? BWAhaha2haaa.....I aint't likely fixin' nuttin'. Blame it on the Bossa Nova...)
To: Rabin
Yeah, stop the terror right freaking now or you get nuked. Deal?
4 posted on
06/25/2016 10:02:24 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(JFK Wanted To Send Man To Moon - Obama Wants To Send Man To Ladies Room)
To: Rabin
Yes, which should be a unilateral bombing of all important targets within Iran.
5 posted on
06/25/2016 10:03:34 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
To: Rabin
Dang, I read that wrong. Thought it said “Should the next President Consider a Plan to Nuke Iran?”
6 posted on
06/25/2016 10:04:20 PM PDT by
Yaelle
(Make America Safe Again)
To: Rabin
Yes. The new Iran nuke deal should consist of one well-placed 10 megaton firecracker.
8 posted on
06/25/2016 10:08:19 PM PDT by
beethovenfan
(Islam is a cancer on civilization.)
To: Rabin
"...told the Council on Foreign Relations..."I think I see the problem.
12 posted on
06/25/2016 11:09:02 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: Rabin
“Should the next US President consider a nuke deal with Iran?”
Of course. Just drop a few nukes on them and make Persia an inhabitle glass desert for the next 10,000 years.
That’s a deal I can accept, support and live with.
13 posted on
06/25/2016 11:18:55 PM PDT by
Roger Kaputnik
(Just because I'm paranoid doesn't prove that they aren't out to get me.)
To: Rabin
"Should next US president consider an Iran nuke deal 2.0?"
What's the point in a treaty if Iran doesn't honor it?
To: Rabin
15 posted on
06/26/2016 12:58:39 AM PDT by
SWAMP-C1PHER
(HOMO, OECONOMIA, ET CIVITAS.)
To: Rabin
Coons is a self-avowed Marxist. RINOs in Delaware helped elect him. They refused to support the party’s nominee, Christine O’Donnell. Then they voted for Coons. Beware Mr. Trump.
I’m not saying that Mr. Trump is anything like Miss O’Donnell. I’m warning him about how traitorous the RINOs are. Keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.
16 posted on
06/26/2016 1:44:50 AM PDT by
NTHockey
(Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
To: Rabin
Didn’t Coons get in there because the RNC/GOPe torpedoed O’Donnell’s campaign?
COD would have thrown a much needed wrench in the obamacare wheel as well.
18 posted on
06/26/2016 3:42:36 AM PDT by
Paulie
(America without Christ is like a Chemistry book without the periodic table.)
To: Rabin
Yes...immediately rip up the one Obama made!
20 posted on
06/26/2016 4:38:20 AM PDT by
ThePatriotsFlag
( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else.)
To: Rabin
We absolutely shoudl do an Iran Nuke deal 2.0 consisting of the delivery of nuclear weapons as ordinance on Tehran, Qom, and while we are at it, Mecca and Medina too, and any other place that has a high concentration of muslims.
21 posted on
06/26/2016 5:53:29 AM PDT by
Ouderkirk
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
To: Rabin
The next President should nuke Iran until it glows.
22 posted on
06/26/2016 6:02:20 AM PDT by
GenXteacher
(You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
To: Rabin
Yes.
Nuke the **** out of them
23 posted on
06/26/2016 6:19:28 AM PDT by
RedStateRocker
(Better questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson