Replies

Interesting comment. That's the kind of observation which throws a light on something no one, inc myself, has noticed before. If the Kenyan was born in 1936 as it says on his tombstone, in 1971 he would have been 35 years of age.

Stanley Armour Dunham on the other hand, born in 1918, would have been 53 at the time of the visit. Can't be positive, but he doesn't look it. However, if the image dates from 1962 when the Kenyan was leaving for Harvard, Stanley Armour would have been 44 and that's more like it. But the Kenyan would have been only 26 years old in 1962 and in that group image he certainly looks considerably older, his facial features are a match for the airport image from 1970-71 Christmas.

The Japanese woman in the black dress has been tentatively identified as a Hawaii university student who graduated in 1959, and the woman with the giraffe neck was a guest at the Nachmanoff social gathering in the early sixties, she graduated from a US mainland school in 1961.

So something is out of whack with that entire image. It was first posted by a PI whose name I barely recall as Cordevila??? and he provided no source. There's a region on the image between the Kenyan and Stanley Armour that has quite obviously been tampered with. I'm sure you can see it.

So that leaves us with the question: WHO does the body belong to we are supposed to believe was Mr Obama from Kenya? And who is the girl?

Below, an image of the Kenyan at the Nachmanoffs in the early 60's.

We think the numerous lei have been added to hide something...that person could be 'anybody'...anyway, thanks for your input, I'll pass it on.

A little about the group image:

http://gulagbound.com/18116/a-closer-look-at-obama-sr/

In a recent article in the Claremont Review of Books, national-security guru Angelo Codevilla makes a provocative claim.

“Another photo, published in a Honolulu newspaper in 1959,” he writes, “shows [Ann’s father] Stanley Dunham escorted by uniformed U.S. Navy officers, greeting Barack Obama Sr., as he arrived in Hawaii from Kenya.”

In the photo, Dunham stands next to Obama smiling. Codevilla contends that the CIA might well have assigned Dunham to keep an eye on Obama, an unwitting pawn in the agency’s mission to woo the emerging African elite.

If Codevilla is right, then Jacobs’ book is close to all wrong. In her account, Obama arrives, alone and friendless in Hawaii, not surrounded by 20 well-wishers, chief among them a future father-in-law who was not yet supposed to be there.

If the date of the photo can be verified as 1959, Codevilla is likely right, and the mystery deepens.

(The source of the image has never been verified as far as we know.)