Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keeping the Constitution: No Broken Windows Allowed
http://articlevblog.com/ ^ | June 23rd 2016 | Rodney Dodsworth

Posted on 06/24/2016 1:19:22 AM PDT by Jacquerie

For those not old enough to know, New York City’s crime rate prior to the Mayor Rudy Giuliani era was so bad that a sci-fi movie, Escape From New York (1981) did very well at the box office. In this dystopian story, Manhattan was walled off and filled with the worst criminals from across America. Mayor (1994-2001) Giuliani famously put into practice a “no broken windows” (NBW) theory of law enforcement. His police no longer ignored misdemeanor violations of the law. The criminal element soon realized that not only were petty crimes prosecuted, but prison time for felony violations was a near certainty. Criminals were no longer coddled and the crime rate plummeted. NYC was livable once again.

The lesson, of course, is that aggressive law enforcement works to protect the people the law is designed to serve. The proven NBW approach strikes me as obviously consistent with natural law. When we sin or commit a crime without receiving punishment, our nature is, unfortunately, prone to commit greater sins or crimes. NBW simply substitutes punishment for reward and discourages crime.

Now, let’s shift gears to the national governing scene, to Washington DC. Here, the criminals don’t get their hands dirty in common street assaults against individuals. Crimes at this level impact and violate an entire nation. The Framers referred to these as high crimes. They are so extraordinary that no manmade statute could possibly describe them all. Despite the ambiguity, high crimes, which can only be committed by those in the top positions of civil trust, are real, and consist of violations of the Constitution. Once these people swear to God that they will uphold and defend the supreme law of the land, they are subject to the impeachment, trial and removal clauses of the Constitution. Uh, well, except they are not. Like the NYC street thugs of 1981, the DC high crime spree continues and grows.

For one illustrative example among probably hundreds, the issuance of regulations with the force of law by the administrative state is a high crime. When administrators from the EPA release their diktats, they usurp a power We The People loaned to congress and congress alone: lawmaking as per Article I § 1. Instead of issuing thousands of regulations per year, scientists at the EPA should submit policy proposals for congress to consider. That is all. When scotus ensconces this practice as Constitutional, scotus also participates in high crimes against the sovereign people. I assert that no high crime against the sovereign people should go unpunished.

Our politicians, scotus, and senior administrative officials have as much respect for the supreme law of the land as the street thugs of NYC respected city ordinances in 1981. The difference is that unlike NYC, no single man, no Rudy Giuliani, can institute a nationwide NBW.

My stance isn’t novel. From Chapter XIX of his Second Treatise, John Locke encouraged an NBW approach to enforcement of the supreme earthly law. Since the legislative power is the creation of civil society, society is not bound to obey those not authorized to make laws. The people are in full liberty and duty to resist the force of those who attempt to impose their raw will upon them. When what constitutes law becomes uncertain, society becomes a confused multitude without order or connection to one another. Without integrity and the keeping of covenants, civil society is not possible.

We have become inured to near daily assaults on our sovereignty. We not only do not have to stand for seemingly minor infringements, such as the issuance of a single EPA regulation, it is our duty to ourselves and posterity to stop the assaults on free government and punish those who recognize no limit to their power. Since the impeachment, trial, removal clauses of the Constitution are dead letters, We The People must institute a national NBW policy through Article V.

Toward this end, I have argued for annual Article V conventions, here and here. Unless our high criminals in DC are made to know that the supreme earthly power, We The People, stand ready every year to look over their shoulders and demand accountability, our continued head-long dive into tyranny is a certainty.

We are the many; our oppressors are the few. Be proactive. Be a Re-Founder. Join Convention of States.

Sign the COS Petition.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: articlev; constitution

1 posted on 06/24/2016 1:19:23 AM PDT by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

You can listen to Sean Hannity rant for ten minutes about how we need to obey the Constitution. Then he will rant for ten minutes about how the federal government should set up “medical savings accounts.”

Where are “medical savings accounts” in the Constitution?


2 posted on 06/24/2016 1:36:22 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

I don’t think Sean wrote this article, so why are you talking about him? He’s a dunce, anyway.


3 posted on 06/24/2016 1:41:40 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Because he’s typical.


4 posted on 06/24/2016 1:56:26 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Here’s my Exhibit A for the “broken window” theory”: Alcee Hastings, currently a Congressman from FL but also a disgraced and impeachment-convicted former federal judge. When Congress will convict a federal judge of the impeachment charges against him and turn around to allow him to be seated in their body, then you know the system is well and truly broken by avarice and greed.


5 posted on 06/24/2016 2:01:58 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

“Now, let’s shift gears to the national governing scene, to Washington DC. Here, the criminals don’t get their hands dirty in common street assaults against individuals. Crimes at this level impact and violate an entire nation. The Framers referred to these as high crimes. They are so extraordinary that no manmade statute could possibly describe them all. Despite the ambiguity, high crimes, which can only be committed by those in the top positions of civil trust, are real, and consist of violations of the Constitution. Once these people swear to God that they will uphold and defend the supreme law of the land, they are subject to the impeachment, trial and removal clauses of the Constitution. Uh, well, except they are not. Like the NYC street thugs of 1981, the DC high crime spree continues and grows.

For one illustrative example among probably hundreds, the issuance of regulations with the force of law by the administrative state is a high crime. When administrators from the EPA release their diktats, they usurp a power We The People loaned to congress and congress alone: lawmaking as per Article I § 1. Instead of issuing thousands of regulations per year, scientists at the EPA should submit policy proposals for congress to consider. That is all. When scotus ensconces this practice as Constitutional, scotus also participates in high crimes against the sovereign people. I assert that no high crime against the sovereign people should go unpunished.”


6 posted on 06/24/2016 2:03:42 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
On the 2nd of June 1787 Dr. Franklin warned our Constitutional Congress about this. Below is, what I think, is the most pertinent paragraph. The bolding is mine.

" Sir, there are two passions which have a powerful influence on the affairs of men. These are ambition and avarice; the love of power, and the love of money. Separately each of these has great force in prompting men to action; but when united in view of the same object, they have in many minds the most violent effects. Place before the eyes of such men, a post of honour that shall be at the same time a place of profit, and they will move heaven and earth to obtain it. The vast number of such places it is that renders the British Government so tempestuous. The struggles for them are the true sources of all those factions which are perpetually dividing the Nation, distracting its Councils, hurrying sometimes into fruitless & mischievous wars, and often compelling a submission to dishonorable terms of peace. And of what kind are the men that will strive for this profitable pre- eminence, through all the bustle of cabal, the heat of contention, the infinite mutual abuse of parties, tearing to pieces the best of characters? It will not be the wise and moderate; the lovers of peace and good order, the men fittest for the trust. It will be the bold and the violent, the men of strong passions and indefatigable activity in their selfish pursuits. These will thrust themselves into your Government and be your rulers. -And these too will be mistaken in the expected happiness of their situation: For their vanquished competitors of the same spirit, and from the same motives will perpetually be endeavouring to distress their administration, thwart their measures, and render them odious to the people."

7 posted on 06/24/2016 2:19:57 AM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

Nope, nowhere in the Constitution.


8 posted on 06/24/2016 2:39:55 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

Agree. I grow weary of pigmentation and muslim immunity.


9 posted on 06/24/2016 2:41:22 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
Oh, and if the convicted felon Chakka Fattah hadn't resigned yesterday, I guarantee Speaker Ryan wouldn't have pressed for his expulsion.
10 posted on 06/24/2016 2:43:41 AM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Where are “medical savings accounts” in the Constitution?

Right next to the bit making abortion a protected right.

Mark

11 posted on 06/24/2016 6:56:11 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

And Soshcurity. Another Constitutional Right revered by Hannity-type constitutionalists.


12 posted on 06/24/2016 11:20:30 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

San Francisco and Oakland are examples of the opposite of NBW. They no longer arrest people for smash and grabs.


13 posted on 06/26/2016 4:50:39 AM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson