Posted on 06/16/2016 3:42:12 AM PDT by milton23
>>And who would want to take a moral girl and send then into our cesspool armed forces?
I served in the military, but no child of mine will serve in this military unless there is a real change in the direction of this nation.
Run along now!
In any culture with a future, eggs are worth much, much more than sperm.
You have nothing to offer. You like watching this country burn. You like feminist to rule the country. Now go vote for your Hillary Clinton.
>>In any culture with a future, eggs are worth much, much more than sperm.
We are no longer a culture with a future. And eggs are only worth more tha sperm when men become stud bulls and women brood mares. If you want monogamy, then they are equally important.
Who said anything about women in combat. There are plenty of REMF jobs that need doing, and thats where they belong.
Hysterical? Check out the clown who cursed at me here and tell him he’s hysterical before you come to me. And please tell others why your position is the conservative position on this issue when the headline of this entire thread is “Conservatives Have a Plan to Block Women in the Draft.”
The ludicrous idea that I consider men “expendable trash” just goes to show you know nothing about me although I’ve been posting here since 2001. I simply think the duties of American women and men are different.
As Desert Rhino pointed out, forcing innocent women into the army because you’re angry at feminists is NOT a conservative position, an intelligent position or a well-thought out position. It’s childish and leftist.
It’s one thing when you curse at me but to attack a very decent, long-time freeper like Trisham is beyond the pale. As if Trisham would ever vote for Hillary or has nothing to offer the country or Free Republic is ludicrous on the face of it. Grow up.
You’re making a fool of yourself.
You’ve been here longer than I, dear Miss M. :)
And when George Bush was president, did you think boys would be able to marry each other and grown men could use the little girl’s room? Or that we would have to accept that if a man tells us he is a woman (or a salmon, for that matter), we would have to believe him or be fired?
In other words, in this deeply corrupted country, I wouldn’t ever say something has a “zero chance” of happening.
I certain agree with you, though, about understanding women’s reproductive value. It’s something to consider deeply rather than making quick, fundamental changes to our culture.
I think you are the one who needs to grow up. You want equal rights, but you still want a man to have more responsibilities that you. You cannot even see that you are a major hypocrite. Where do you think all these women’s rights are going to head? It will head towards men boycotting marriage, and an expect them to go to war in your favor?
You discuss how none of us have women in our lives to care about, and discount your sons and grandsons and fathers? You are a hypocrite, it shows that you value men less than women.
You address nothing as far as how men get killed in divorces.
Yes, you and Trishem can join the male hating Hillary Clinton.
You both have thrown insults at me and added nothing to the debate. Feel bad for your husband, if you choose to divorce him, you will probably follow the feminist divorce playbook and think there is nothing wrong with it. You will start by draining the bank account, maxing out the credit cards, then seek crippling alimony payments.
Who reads your drivel?
Apparently you. Like I said, you want to see your sons dead, their lives aren’t worth much to you. Just like Hillary Clinton.
Great verbiage!
>>Young women form the foundation of the Progressive movement.
It wasn’t the sons of “progressives” who were sent to
Vietnam, and it won’t be the daughter’s of “progressives” who are sent off to the next “progressive” Military Industrialized L.I.F.E.R. cluster frack, either.
[Eisenhower’s “Military-Industrial Complex” Speech Origins and Significance]
US National Archives
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y
>>It wasn’t the sons of “progressives” who were sent to
Vietnam, and it won’t be the daughter’s of “progressives” who are sent off to the next “progressive” Military Industrialized L.I.F.E.R. cluster frack, either.
This is one of those cases where history is irrelevant since literally EVERYTHING has changed. Young women are overwhelmingly Progressive in 21st century America. That is a fact. They don’t listen to people like you and me, telling us to stop mansplaining life because they know sooooo much.
A young man is born with a millstone around neck in our culture. He is more likely to die from violence. Schools drug him into submission so he hates learning. Universities (if he even gets to attend) teach that he is evil. He is only a source of sperm and child support to the mother of his children. And in the workplace, he can’t get promoted because the guy on “Mad Men” is a misogynist.
So, I don’t give a crap if young women have to register for a draft that will never happen because drafts “disproportionately affect minorities more than whites”.
This issue a distraction, people!
>> literally EVERYTHING has changed.
Mary Mary, Quiet Contrary - how did/does their Shubbery grow?
[Eisenhower’s “Military-Industrial Complex” Speech Origins and Significance]
US National Archives
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.