Posted on 05/15/2016 11:18:28 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
It’s all in the interpretation.
The 2nd Amendment can be re-interpreted to mean whatever they want.
Cubanadians and Keyanesians are now eligible to be President.
Homosexuals can “marry”.
Women can murder their children (as long as they do it before birth) and it is legal.
Even her close friends hate her.
Me, but then again, I’m not a liberal progressive socialist.
I guess she pays them well.
On the other hand, the wording of the Second Amendment being so short and clear, I really don’t find any room for twiddling and fiddling for a reinterpretation.
Our forefathers meant what they said ad said what they meant.
On the other hand, the wording of the Second Amendment being so short and clear, I really don’t find any room for twiddling and fiddling for a reinterpretation.
Our forefathers meant what they said and said what they meant.
I seem to recall that the proximate cause that fired the American Revolution was the government confiscating guns.
Absolutely right. Lexington was about gun control.
You are also right that it is clear as day what they meant by “shall not be infringed”. Yet there are already numerous infringements.
They were also clear as day when they specified natural born citizen for President.
The Kenyanesian Usurpation is in its 8th year.
And this pleases you somehow? Dear Lord, I sincerely hope you’ve come to your senses.
What I clearly stated “amuses” me is that the Democrat hierarchy is force feeding the less desirable candidate down their voters throats.
Do you have a problem with that?
Not a problem, I just seem to recall your abject disdain for Trump. Forget it, I really don’t care.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.