Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Times Article on Ben Rhodes Exposes White House Contempt for the Press and Public
Canada Free Press ^ | 05/12/16 | Roger Aronoff

Posted on 05/12/2016 7:46:28 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

President Obama himself who is responsible for the spin coming out of the White House

A recent article by David Samuels for the New York Times Magazine demonstrates how President Obama and his Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes have been exploiting the media’s willingness to repeat and promote the Obama administration narrative of the day. In the interview Rhodes irreverently nicknames the foreign policy establishment “the Blob” and states that most reporters the administration deals with on foreign affairs are only 27 years old and know nothing. The Blob includes not only top media people, but also “Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates and other Iraq war promoters from both parties who now whine incessantly about the collapse of the American security order in Europe and the Middle East.”

Carlos Lozada of The Washington Post describes the Times’ piece as so sycophantic that it has become “gross” through excess chumminess, hypocrisy and absurdity. For example, Lozada writes, “It is the blindness of a writer who declares that Rhodes is ‘not an egotist’ while offering countless examples of that subject’s gargantuan self-regard, and not bothering to note the contradiction.”


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: benrhode; media; obama; times

1 posted on 05/12/2016 7:46:29 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Nice we can at least get the Truth from Canada and other places.


2 posted on 05/12/2016 8:23:07 AM PDT by bboop (does not suffer fools gladly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Wow, the press will probably turn on Obama now! [crickets .... crickets .... ]


3 posted on 05/12/2016 8:51:24 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
Former Ambassador William G. Miller confirmed to author and historian Michael Ledeen that Obama sent Miller to Iran as a secret back-channel emissary during Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign.

Miller was to inform the Iranian leaders that if they wait for Obama to become president, “they would be very happy with his policies.”

4 posted on 05/12/2016 9:03:00 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

the so-called Iran deal was never even signed.


5 posted on 05/12/2016 9:03:50 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bboop

Nice we can at least get the Truth from Canada and other places.


Agree. I usually look at the UK stuff to filter out what the MSM has sanitized....


6 posted on 05/12/2016 9:06:25 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

...the administration’s well-cultivated network of officials, talking heads, columnists and newspaper reporters, web jockeys and outside advocates who can tweet at critics and tweak their stories backed up by quotations from ‘senior White House officials’ and ‘spokespeople.


7 posted on 05/12/2016 9:07:06 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

Miller was to inform the Iranian leaders that if they wait for Obama to become president, “they would be very happy with his policies.”


Similar to his coded message to Putin, and certainly not what the voters heard
when he talked about “ talking to his enemies”.... what that really meant is I’ll five you what you want....


8 posted on 05/12/2016 9:07:48 AM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr Apple; SunkenCiv; Albion Wilde

Remember, it was also Rhodes who authored the Benghazi “smoking gun” email which sought as a goal to “underscore” that the attacks that killed four Americans resulted from “protests [that] are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”


9 posted on 05/12/2016 9:09:02 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: patriotspride
So Obama did that with BOTH Iran and Russia.

TREASON, anyone?

10 posted on 05/12/2016 9:11:37 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: patriotspride

the emotion driving the administration’s foreign policy is contempt—

contempt for allies, colleagues, and the generations of American policymakers who built the post-WWII international order, ensuring relative global stability, and peace and prosperity at home.


11 posted on 05/12/2016 9:13:00 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

the emotion driving the administration’s foreign policy is contempt—

contempt for allies, colleagues, and the generations of American policymakers who built the post-WWII international order, ensuring relative global stability, and peace and prosperity at home.


So true. He’s overt with it, but the MSM never calls him out...


12 posted on 05/12/2016 12:25:26 PM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson
the so-called Iran deal was never even signed.

I didn't know this.
I presume the Iranians have already received that 150 billion?

13 posted on 05/12/2016 5:15:31 PM PDT by Mr Apple ( WE MUST HAVE THAT SCOTUS PICK! WE JUST MUST!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson