Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: SoCal Pubbie

I don’t think there is any Supreme Court case that says it, but when Clinton was President, that was the argument that was made about what had to take place. Impeachment first, then prosecution. I suspect the Supreme Court would agree.

The only wild card I see here is that the criminal act occurred before she would have become President. Maybe that makes a difference.


23 posted on 05/05/2016 3:57:55 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Brilliant

Why would the supreme court agree? Where does the constitution or federal law give the executive branch immunity from prosecution?


24 posted on 05/05/2016 3:59:53 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson