ESPIONAGE ACT INDICTMENT LOOMS OVER HILLARY CLINTON & HER CAMPAIGN

D.C. Whispers ^ | May 4, 2016 | DCWhispers

[advertising guy]

I have posted multiple times 2 huge and overlooked election issues

The “quote” brokered convention all barked about was a ruse, sorta, Trump won and it has been known for 4 months he was gonna win

Nope,that brokered convention is for the dems
Hillary will not be the nominee,so who is Trump actually runnin against ,really?

[Art in Idaho]

So much info, so little time. For Trump's people:

Please check the above links plus our revered Nachum:

http://nachumlist.com/emailgate.htm

Please check posts by Nachum, Liz and others. We can do this!

[Art in Idaho]

when the FBI calls HRC in, she'll answer their questions behind closed doors — so no pounding the table on her part, no playing the victim for the cameras. That is, if her attorneys even permit her to talk to the FBI. They may stall as long as possible, since she'll be in a legally perilous spot when she talks to them, as she won't know what the FBI knows. And now that Fox news has come out with an interview with Guciffer, the guy who hacked into Sydney Blumenthal’s server, which led him to hack into HRC’s server, NBC has released its own interview with Guciffer. (Gee, I wonder why NBC has been sitting on that...?) Let the good times roll!

Yes, more and more the story is getting out. A lot of it has been known since March, 2015, but hey, better late than never. We are at War with the left and Hillary. Fight On!

I hope Trump's people are reviewing all the info on Free Republic. If any of you have any connections with them, please send this info to them.

[ridesthemiles]

If her hard drive was transferred to the cloud”””

Go to thread number 3427056 here on FR. Seems Shrillary paid a company in Sparks, Nevada to destroy records.

www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3427056/posts

[ridesthemiles]

That way Obama cannot pardon her”””

*I am not so sure. I think Obama can pardon her for ‘anything she may have done’.

[utahagen]

“Seems Shrillary paid a company in Sparks, Nevada to destroy records.”

I believe that company in Colorado stored backups in the cloud, although HRC may not have realized it, so destroying hard drives wouldn't matter. Plus, I believe the hard drive destructions happened fairly recently.

I'm betting the FBI has all those deleted emails. IT people tell me that believing anything is really deleted these days is folly.

[Art in Idaho]

Thanks for the link. As I said, I hope Trump's staff review all this data and advise Trump on talking points. There's so much data it will be hard to summarize but the major points can at least be put 'out there' for everyone to review.

[Art in Idaho]

Drip, drip, drip. . .

FBI interviews Clinton aides including Huma Abedin as part of email probe Hillary date in the coming weeks. Will her attorneys let her speak?

[fortheDeclaration]

Not in polls in actual voting!

As for polls, some have Trump neck and neck with Hillary, some slightly behind.

Reagan started 20 pts behind Carter.

Bush Sr. was 10 pts behind Dukais.

[LucyT]

Article and comments.

Thanks, Art in Idaho.

[stephenjohnbanker]

B T T T

[hoosiermama]

Solyndra is owned mostly by the company Os great grandfather worked for. The one whose money started the family trust that O still has income from. (Check his schedule E)

[MV=PY]

"Even though he was given immunity he refuses to answer questions."

I thought the FBI granted immunity in exchange for their interviews with him. He's pleading the 5th to congressional interviews. (I thought the FBI got what they were after.)

[Salvation]

for later

[Stentor]

18 U.S.C. § 793 : US Code - Section 793: Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information.

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer - Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

[Art in Idaho]

18 U.S.C. § 793 : US Code - Section 793: Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information.

2. having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer - Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Obama knew she didn't have a state.gov email address. He's complicit too. Six year statute of limitations.

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

I think the section you posted agrees with me...?

This is the famous 18 USC section salient to HRCs’ email activities.

The awesome responsibility of simply possessing these items in any form whatsoever....As I said, it isn’t a “deliberate” or “by accident” duality.

Granting of access to these materials (eg; a “security clearance”) carries the explicit acceptance of the complete responsibility of either shepherding it/them in the prescribed fashion of using strictly government servers; or, immediately reporting any security breach that the security clearance itself provides for.

So HRC’s whole “I didn’t know” line of reasoning is impossible in its very utterance, in any variation. It’s not possible for her to not know. If she knows enough to NOT use (and never sign up for or on to) the gov’t server then she must be aware that breaching the gov’t <> private barrier is the offense. This is the mens rea alone and by itself, without any reference to any external act or consequence. There is no plausible reason to avoid the gov’t server other than to keep her affairs off it/them. That she (or the Clinton foundation) paid for her server and the IT setup of same and remotely located it all only bolsters the case that she worked to hide her affairs.

So then, if she receives her official email on her private server, that is the same type of illegal security breach proscribed in the law. Just receiving it. Just receiving it without knowing or not knowing whether it was deemed “classified”. If you received it...then realized it was classified...then where is the report that secrecy laws were breached? She never made any such report, as far as I know, though it would not surprise me that the report of a classified security breach is itself classified the instant it is generated and thus we would not know about it.

But AFAIK, she has not stated to date anything at all suggesting she made a “breach” report...as is her absolute responsibility...and the failure to so report is exactly the same offense as offering it up for sale or leaving on the seat of a taxi by accident. No, she has made excuse after excuse how an innocent grandmother shouldn’t have to cope with these kinds of trivialities.

[Stentor]

I think the section you posted agrees with me...?

That's right. If the facts are as reported, she's lead pipe cinch guilty as sin and I'm the prosecutor's worst nightmare when I'm on a jury.

[RightGeek]

Another visitor:

[timestax]

pinging