Ted Cruz is hiding plenty of bad things

Red State Watcher ^ | 4/30/2016

[Amntn]

Ted Cruz’s Immigration Advice to George W. Bush

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/12/18/us/politics/immigration-document.html?_r=2

[Bob434]

until then htough we have to see the site infested with ‘cruz is an A@#$@#$hole’ pile on threads- Seems the Christians here love inciting hatred

[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

I doubt you reading her written text in the back of report every trump supporter claims she coauthored will change your mind....so I am not going to bother putting a link up.

or I will when the 8th grade girl maturity level folks show me the affidavit or video of one of all those ladies Cruz allegedly had affairs with.

If Trump gets the nomination I will hold myy nose and vote for his immature ass...but it will set back the movement a decade at least.

People can tell themselves he has evolved on all the issues he has held liberal positions on for decades...they can even claim he gave money to Schumer and those other NY liberals because he had to do it to do business in that state.

But how do they explain money going to CA liberals?

Buying Chinese manufactured products and slapping the Trump name on it but now claiming to be for the Anerican worker.

Etc etc.

No politician or human is perfect...neither in spirit nor in policy.

But I believe Trump is trying to be a NY politician like Bloomberg....easier to get the GOP nomination and be a lefty than win the Rat nomination.

[CyberAnt]

I’ve never heard of anyone so full of vitriol in my life.

Why don’t you focus on your candidate instead of smearing Ted Cruz.

You don’t like Ted; tough bananas. Get a life.

[Edward.Fish]

HEIDI crafted the NAU?? REALLY? ALL BY HERSELF?

Not all by herself, but it looks like she was involved:
Building a North American Community

[Eisenhower Republican]

"how many countries other than the USA even have a clause such as Natural-Born-Citizn?"

Nearly all civilized nations have a similar requirement for their highest office. Most also have far more stringent criteria than we do for both jus sanguinis and jus solis before someone could be considered natural born. We're one of less than a handful of Western countries where Cruz would not have had to undergo a lengthy visa and naturalization process to even call himself a citizen.

[trebb]

There will come a time when Trump buyers remorse will kick in. But we’ll put that aside until after the election.

What a compelling argument to stick with the guy going on an ego-driven vendetta and making deals with those he claims to hate and who actually do hate him as he goes about a hissy-fit of trying tho thwart the will of the People.

At least our "remorse" won't be from handing Hillary the WH as Cruz seems determined to do.

Is that Cruz's new campaign slogan: "You'll be sorry...."?

I bet he sends Carly out to deliver the message.....

[trebb]

Will you stand with Trump when he demonizes people like me for conscientious policy disagreements? Or will you join in on the witch hunt?

Need to change your screen name to "TrumpDelusionalParanoiaBoy"

You appear to be running on pure emotion - never a good place to be when discussing reality of such importance....

[DaxtonBrown]

“until then htough we have to see the site infested with ‘cruz is an A@#$@#$hole’ pile on threads”

I’ve actually been here since 1998. Had to change screen names so I don’t get whacked by Harry Reid. I remember a time when George Bush could also do no wrong. Trump is much preferable to Hillary, but he will soon be throwing stinkbombs regularly because he is not a principled conservative, he is an unrestrained populist.

[1rudeboy]

No, not in the mail room. But I do work in a cube not far from George Soros' office, so I hear things. Nothing even close to that born in the fevered minds of the more rabid Trump supporters.

And I will vote for Trump if the time comes, wondering why his dogs spent so much more time going after Cruz rather than Bernie or Hillary.

[1rudeboy]

Just ask the people whining the loudest about the Building a North American Community paper if they've read it. They'll run away.

[1rudeboy]

And it looks like you are leading off.

What in the paper do you find most objectionable? Please be specific. Citations to the document would be a plus. You see, I don't care that much for the opinions of people writing about it. Because I've read it.