Posted on 04/22/2016 12:11:31 AM PDT by marktwain
Governor Doug Ducey of Arizona signed HB 224, which protects the right to transfer firearms in private transactions, without fee, tax or encumbrance, into law on 30 March, 2016. The law went into effect on 31 March.
From the Governor's Office:
"This bill protects the Second Amendment freedoms of Arizonans by allowing for the exchange of firearms without assessments or penalties imposed by state and local government.
The law is succinct and easily understood, a nice contrast with much legislation that is passed in recent times. From cqstatetrack.com:
CHAPTER 36HB 224 passed the House with a strong 35-25 vote; then it passed the Senate with a vote of 19 to 10, was transmitted to Governor Ducey on 29 March, and signed the next day.
PRIVATE FIREARM TRANSACTIONS
ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
44-7851. Definitions
In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
1. "Firearm" Means any loaded or unloaded handgun, pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun or other weapon that will expel or that is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a solid projectile by the action of expanding gases.
2. "Private party" means a person who is not a prohibited possessor under state or federal law and does not include a person who possesses a federal firearms license and who primarily engages in the business of selling, trading or purchasing firearms.
3. "Transfer" means when a person gives, loans, offers for sale, wills or in any manner offers another person a firearm for any lawful purpose and the person is not a prohibited possessor under state or federal law.
44-7852. Private party firearms transfer; state or political subdivision encumbrance prohibited This state or any political subdivision of this state may not enact or implement any additional fee, tax, assessment, lien or other encumbrance on the transfer of a firearm between two private parties who are not prohibited possessors under state or federal law.
We should deport all the illegal invaders to the Mariana islands and see how quickly their position on gun control changes.
So is the Bloomberg “background check” scheme DOA?
You gotta have a dealer perform the check and he ain’t agonna do it for free - although I’ll warrant some go-around might be figured out.
If you don't mind, I'd rather give the WORKING, NON-CRIMINAL illegal invaders a pass and send the CRIMINAL ones along with a lot of hoodrats, EBT queens and methheads to the Marianas.
They’re all felons, so yes, they are all law-breakers.
No, first-time illegals are guilty of a misdemeanor for their entry.
(WIKI entry)
The illegal entry of non-nationals into the United States is a misdemeanor according to the [[Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965|Immigration and Nationality Act]], which prohibits non-nationals from entering or attempting to enter the United States at any time or place which has not been designated by an immigration officer, and also prohibits non-nationals from eluding inspection by immigration officers.
Embarrassing
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.