Posted on 04/12/2016 8:30:28 PM PDT by Sontagged
Obama Friendly Judge A Repeat Offender – Okays Illegal Alien Ted Cruz In NJ/Liberal Judge Who Ruled Obama A Citizen Repeats Same Mistake With Cruz
As was expected, the New Jersey judge who ruled in 2012 that Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen without having to personally see the relevant documents has made the same baseless decision in the matter of Canadian Ted Cruz. He’s accepted the birth certificate of Canadian birth to a US mother as documentation of his fitting the requirements for being a natural born citizen, without ever having to have been declared a US citizen in compliance with the law.
Unless Cruz registered with the State Department as an American citizen prior to his 18th birthday, documenting his foreign birth, or was naturalized in some other way, he is today a foreigner. This judge chose to focus narrowly on the issue of a single parent being able to convey natural-born status, which is almost irrelevant in some ways to the Cruz situation. He missed completely, probably because it fits his globalist establishment duties to do so, the larger issue of Cruz failing to become an American citizen under the law.
The pro-Cruz, pro-GOP establishment Townhall.com reported simplistically, “A judge in New Jersey has ruled that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is indeed a natural-born citizen and is therefore eligible to be on the New Jersey ballot. Cruz, who was born in Calgary while his father was working there, is an American citizen via his mother’s American citizenship.”
American citizen and natural born are two different things. More importantly in the case of this illegal alien Ted Cruz, is the “fact” that his records are hidden, just as his comrade Hussein Obama has hidden his, because he is not an American citizen. Having failed to apply for US citizenship by the age of 18 prevents it from being conveyed to him by birth.
This agenda-driven judge chose to ignore that reality. The citizenship of his parents is of no benefit if he never acted upon it, which he did not. He’s a foreigner and they are deliberately skewing the argument to once again subvert our Constitution and advance the anti-American globalist interests.
The candidate, Victor Williams, has seven more cases filed. Maybe he’ll find an honest judge who will demand that Cruz show his records somewhere along the way. Maybe the other seven will also contend that we must trust and not verify when Lyin’ Ted says he’s an American. Maybe the corruption has already gone too far.
I’m Rick Wells – a constitutional conservative writer who recognizes that our nation, our Constitution and our traditions are under a full scale assault from multiple threats. I’m not PC; I call it like I see it.
You are wrong yet again. On ethanol he said that the laws on the books should be obeyed. On Federal Healthcare support that is a 100% lie, promoted the the MSN and by Ted Cruz.
Just read the Trump’s Healthcare plan on his website and review his statements for the last 16 years. Or keep spreading misinformation. The choice is yours.
www.ontheissues.org/2016/Donald_Trump_Health_Care.htm
Two of your links are to:
1. A review prepared for Congress by a partisan who was attempting to get the NBC definition changed. There have been multiple attemps over the last 20 years because weakening our Nationalism plays into the plans of the Globalists.
2. The Harvard Law Review was not independent they were picked Cruz allies.
The recent Pa & NJ court rulings are ludicrous, opinions on the part of two judges without legal base or review of any evidence.
Your last Minor v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1874)is about citizenship not NBC. In fact the opinion in that case upholds the traditional view of NBC.
“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. “
No with only one citizen parent he’s not.
That is support for subsidies and he wants a higher percentage of ethanol in gasoline than current levels.
Trump’s stance on healthcare has been all over the place. I am glad he finally arrived at some position on it.
Trump has been a business man for a long time. Get your mind out of the gutter and face the realities of the construction business. You have to get along with everyone to be successful.
I have known since passing a test on the US Constitution back in the late 60's what is a 'natural born' US citizen... I am foreign born... born in Germany, in a German hospital... to two US citizen parents... I do NOT have a born in the USA birth certificate... Thus I am NOT a 'natural born' US citizen and am NOT eligible to hold the office of president.
'Natural born' US citizenship does NOT come from Congress or a willingly ignorant unConstitutional judge, playing fast and loose with the Constitution. 'Natural born' US citizenship comes from TWO US citizen parents, birthing their child on US soil. Natural born US citizenship is akin to a birthright... Do you need Congress or a leftist judge to determine what a 'firstborn' is?
Cruz is not nor will he ever be a 'natural born' US citizen. He was NOT born on US soil, and his father did not become a US citizen until 2005. Cruz only recently gave up his Canadian citizenship...
IF Cruz is considered eligible then anyone is eligible.
BTW, this case you provided also states that NBC are defined in the Constitution.
Maybe you would like to look at the numerous links I provided to see what is said about the Constitution's meaning of NBC.
Yes that was in the judges statement that came out today.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2800337/Ted-Cruz-Decision.pdf
Cruz Eligibility Rulings
Arkansas (Librace v Cruz) dismissed
Florida (Voeltz v Cruz) dismissed
Illinois Election Board, Cruz ruled eligible
Indiana Election Commission (Cruz),Cruz ruled eligible.
New Hampshire Ballot Commission, Cruz ruled eligible
New Jersey (Williams v Cruz), Cruz ruled eligible
New York (Korman & Gallo v Cruz) dismissed
Pennsylvania (Elliott v Cruz) Cruz ruled eligible
Utah (Wagner v Cruz) dismissed, appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Yes, he was a citizen but not a Natural born citizen. That takes two citizen parents and birth on US soil.
So the guy’s been a nut all along. He has his own daft interpretation of the constitution and there are no checks and balances.
It certainly is fraud, just because you cannot recognize fraud is not my problem, it is your problem. But it will become my problem when he becomes disqualified.
.
.
ZERO.
.
P.S. You can probable bet that the future donations from me will look about the same.
Ted Cruz has raised $67 million thus far so spending a few hundred thou on eligibility lawsuits is chump change, particularly when Ted has won every legal challenge and he hasn’t spent a second in court, only his attorneys have appeared.
In the end, Judge Masin ruled that Obama’s nomination petition was not defective, Obama had no obligation to prove his eligibility, and that in general the children of aliens born in the United States were natural born citizens.
And this is what you are hanging your hat on? Still want to try and claim you want to restore the Constitution?
I swear sometimes I think the barn door was left open from some infowar web site and you guys slithered in.
Sorry but it has not been adjudicated in the Supreme Court, so any discussion of natural born citizen is speculation based on what the founders were influenced by. There is only one time when the term natural born citizen has even appeared in a legal context besides its invocation in the constitution. In that law, only one parent had to be a citizen for a child born abroad to be a NBC.
Its absurd to suggest that simply because Cruz meets a certain standard, then anyone also meets that standard. You never studied logic in Germany, did you?
I see you have not read the references.
I have spelled it out in detail to one poster today and will not do it again.
Trump’s healthcare position has not waffled. He is and has been for more than a decade in favor of HSA plans and free market coverage with competition across state lines. He has talked about the Government supported programs for the indigent and Medicare as also benefiting form increased competition and efficiency.
In addition Trump has repeatedly stated that Obamacare will be ended and that Veterans will be able to use the same doctors and hospitals that any Medicare patient can use which will improve their care vastly and impose discipline on the VA system. Trump spoke of single payer systems in UK and Canada as having worked for them but said they were not appropriate for the US situation.
The MSN and Cruz have tried to pretend that the statements about the indigent (who have medicaid now) represent Trump’s plan for everyone. That is where their Trump supports single payer garbage comes from.
That has never been determined by a court. It is simply speculation and many independent legal scholars disagree with you.
Just using trump supporter logic that they would say if it was Cruz or Rubio who had made donations to buy influence with politicians.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.