Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: patlin
Have you ever seen a presidential ballot application? Right on it one must sign under oath that they are a ‘natural born citizen’, therefore, if he signed that he was, he committed fraud.

I'm late to this thread and haven't read through it yet, so I apologize if this issue has already been addressed.

If Cruz has reasonable grounds to believe he qualifies as a natural born citizen, there is no intent to commit fraud. No court in the land would convict someone under these circumstances.

The question of what constitutes a natural born citizen is clearly not as firmly established as some would want to believe. Cruz has lots of legal authorities who agree with his position.

225 posted on 04/09/2016 11:13:55 AM PDT by CommerceComet (Ignore the GOP-e. Cruz to victory in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: CommerceComet
If Cruz has reasonable grounds to believe he qualifies as a natural born citizen, there is no intent to commit fraud

he is a constitutional lawyer who has argued before the Supreme Court and to say he is not aware of Rogers v. Bellei (1971), a frequently referenced SCOTUS case used to this day, even by the government, if this be the case, the Cruz is no constitutional scholar and a very ill educated lawyer.

228 posted on 04/09/2016 11:58:37 AM PDT by patlin ("Knowledgee chosen to participate inthat is - 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson