[[Yeah, and Cruz didn’t say anything at all about being the Boston Strangler, or the Zodiac Killer so he must be guilty of murder too! Geez, this place is overflowing with logical fallacies.]]
Aint that the truth- I can’t count how many times I’ve seen someone idiotically say “
He didn’t file a lawsuit, so he must be hiding something” or something similar along those lines-
He was seen i na room with other people- some of whom were women- therefore He’s an adulterer- or “His wife didn’t look enthusiastic enough onstage with him- therefore He’s an adulterer- or “He didn’t state his anger angrily enough therefore he’s guilty-
It’s just rediculous
The electoral campaign has gone personal and nasty. Attacks on family members have emerged including criminally intended threats against Donald Trump’s family members.
But you all are omitting in your comments what’s behind these personal attacks and criminally intended threats and in so doing are being used as unwitting dupes. The Clinton machine is criminal and nasty and you can bet they are pulling strings here.
Consider the following post about how the democrats are positioning against Ted Cruz:
“Jeff Dinetz writing for ‘The Lid’ conveniently forgets that democrats and their media attack dogs would be all over this story 24/7, repeating so often that it would become a reality lie in all democrats minds, minds that would never let go of it and never be swayed otherwise.”
“Further, as the Cruz team would ramp up the dirty. sordid history of Scumbag Bill, the democrats would parade the alleged, truest, fact-twisted truth-lie of women having affairs with the Cubadian holy-roller Teddy Swaggart on every broadcast and print media outlet non-stop until it became a part of the permanent political narrative of 2016.”
“So go ahead Dinetz, go ahead and present your case for Cruz. you may be right but it won’t matter much and in fact, it will only keep the allegations in the public eye longer thus doing more damage than was ever intended.”