Posted on 03/26/2016 8:01:15 PM PDT by Zakeet
sorry, I’m rather new, so I did not know there was a way to CC everyone
I thought I had made some sort of spam list
btw, thanks for the heads up
I saw the video from CTH and thought it kind of looked “iffy”
Not as long as they just say they are reporting what "sources" say. Remember the NYT reported John McCain's supposed affairs with lobbyists?
Cruz, Amanda and Katrina better start SUING the NE!!
LOL!! THAT is FUNNY!!
The front cover to day has Blake Shelton cheating with 4 women at the same time he’s dating Gwen.
Since when did the Huff-Post, Salon, NE become legit news sources?
I wasn't 'slamming a character witness', I was slamming you for trying to use his opinion as evidence.
Oh - and you can save the 'shaming' bit. You're the keeper of my conscience.
NOT the keeper - essh. More coffee.
What profanity?
Be careful ascribing honesty and propriety to politicians.
I’ve come to the conclusion that all the Cruz haters on FR are GOPe supporters.
This is the title at the link, and was the original title posted here. I thought FR had a policy against changing titles?
"How I Know The National Enquirer Cruz Affair Story Is Bull Sh*t"
It isn't the number that matters. Ted is most likely, based on the confirmation evidence from the Washington Times reporter and from the brother in law of another Cruz woman, an adulterer and a horrible hypocrite. And if it is true, he is also a pathological liar.
If none of it is true, then I would be amazed. There are simply too many trails of smoke here to convince me there isn't fire.
Really? You’re offended by this? Are you one of them snowflakes?
So with that pivot, you concede the fact the credibility of the NE is faulty at best then, unless you lump Sarah Palin in with “politicians.”
Yep - and they have come out to refute some of Cruz's claims which indicates they either have something solid or they're bluffing big time (which would be useless).
Most of the article uses the guy's own personal opinions/gut feelings to "refute" the issues - not really a convincing argument unless one wants to believe it even if it does prove right.
I have no idea but I do know that Cruz has said some things and done some things that make me a bit leery of his purported role as "Super Christian Champion of the People".
Trump wants to take down the other side and Cruz wants to take down Trump - despite that still leaving him a long-shot and enhancing Hillary's chances - not what I expected of him as others tried to paint Trump as the "egotistic narcissist"...
Thanks, This is the only link that I have posted several times.
What every voter needs to know about Ted Cruz.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXcYCwaBKnQ&app=desktop
Bill Sill’s #736 was posted twice. And I agree with your rational.
I see, solid facts with no other possible explanation.
____________________________________________________________
1+1 generally equals 2, sorry I am not going to act as an apologist for anyone. Apparently you want the Trump campaign to announce the smear on Cruz? :D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.