Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: MichCapCon

” Instead, occupational licensure protects existing practitioners and businesses from competition and unnecessarily prevents others from using their talents to make a living.”

I’m a Professional Engineer. State Engineering boards are the most shiftless, lazy group. Their sole purpose is to harvest license fees from people like me that are registered in multiple states. They don’t care about the profession, they care about bogus “continuing education” under-the-table deals and with getting paid for doing little.

I don’t have a problem with licensure requirements, you can make an argument for it for a lot reasons - some good, some spurious.

BUT....it should be accepted in any state.

To do this, state licensing boards would have to harmonize requirements and licensing (and disciplinary actions). That sounds like work, so I don’t see it happening.


8 posted on 01/07/2016 3:24:09 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RFEngineer
State licensing boards keep other professionals from retiring into their state and practicing their craft. Florida and Texas are the most egregious. The state boards are full of protectionistic professionals guarding their home turf.
11 posted on 01/07/2016 3:37:16 PM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: RFEngineer

Or, we could use the “Full Faith and Credit” clause in the Constitution. If you are engineer enough for one state, it should be good for all. Like marriage or driver’s license.


21 posted on 01/07/2016 8:32:48 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson