It isn’t above your paygrade. The concept that the Constitution can only be understood by Constitutional lawyers is mal-education.
The Constitution isn’t that difficult to understand.
Justification for some of the crap federal judges have come up with...THAT might require a post-graduate degree in such matters.
I agree it’s not difficult to understand, but in areas that are not clearly defined is it not hard to see why the debate over those items becomes so contentious?
It happens even on a thread like this where we are all conservatives with very similar worldviews. That proves how open and shut this case isn’t.