Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ben Carson: Can Obama use martial law to keep White House post 2016
Communities Digital News ^ | November 19, 2015 | James Richard Edwards

Posted on 12/17/2015 3:16:24 PM PST by SetFree

Carson went on liberal radio host Alan Colmes’ radio show...He said that there may not even be elections in 2016; when pressed to explain further, Carson said,

“If in fact we continue to have all these decrees being made the way they’re being made, if in fact we don’t fight the kind of war that needs to be fought in order to really put an end to the threat that is brought on by ISIS, if we continue along a pathway of financial irresponsibility, if we continue along a path of envy, greed, and hatred — what happened with Occupy Wall Street will be a cakewalk compared to what will begin to happen in this country.”

When Colmes pushed Carson further on the possibility of cancelled or postponed elections, Carson responded, “I don’t want to find out, I really don’t want to find out. I don’t want to continue down this pathway that we are going down. This pathway where everything is framed in a political sense and our representatives are not working for the people, they’re working for their party.”

(Excerpt) Read more at commdiginews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: elections; law; martial; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: SetFree

But something is different this time around —

Obviously the Democrats would like to keep Obama in beyond his allotted time.
And this time, the GOP (the *cough* “opposition party”) would love to find a way to keep Trump out of the White House.

Bottomline: if both major political parties want the election to be suspended, I think it will be suspended. No Civil War would erupt because there would not be two sides to that argument.

But perhaps grassroots rebellion would be likely.


21 posted on 12/17/2015 3:36:13 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (I support anything which diminishes the Muslim population.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Of course they can.


22 posted on 12/17/2015 3:36:58 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

“If he doesn’t follow the law now, why would he suddenly do it in January 2017?”

My guess is that he will wait until October 2016 and let the hammer drop on the hildabeast, then jump in to save the rat party. Media, house, senate would all back his executive order nullifying the twenty second amendment.


23 posted on 12/17/2015 3:37:06 PM PST by RS_Rider (I hate Illinois Nazis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

We won’t have long to wait to see if you are right or I am right. I don’t want to be right. And I sure don’t want to be saying: “Told you so.”

But the real question is, play a fantasy game with me for the moment and say he does do it. Do you really know anyone that would take up arms? Not B.S. or false bravado. Do you know ANYONE that you are sure would actually fire a shot in protest?

I know a lot of big talkers and big posters, but I don’t know anyone that would fight an Obama dictatorship.


24 posted on 12/17/2015 3:42:50 PM PST by Gadsden1st
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

You and scores of other FREEPERS


25 posted on 12/17/2015 3:42:56 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true .... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st

I agree with you.

And note — if anyone did take up arms, the media would be instantly full of stories about “the crazy guy” in Wisconsin, or Maryland, or Nevada. There would be heart-wrenching stories about the grief-stricken families of the federal judge or IRS agent that was gunned down by the violent extremist.

And 99.9% of the public would *tsk*tsk*tsk* and say “That’s not who we are. There’s no need for violence. I’m sure that — one of these days — we will be allowed to have another election. And then we can all vote for change, like good Americans.”


26 posted on 12/17/2015 3:48:30 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (I support anything which diminishes the Muslim population.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Original Lurker

Huh?


27 posted on 12/17/2015 3:50:20 PM PST by rusureitflies? (Not much to say, yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: driftless2

I don’t think it would mean civil war—just a little housecleaning in D C.


28 posted on 12/17/2015 3:51:04 PM PST by jimbug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st

I don’t think it would go that far. I doubt anyone would enforce such a decree. Even most Democrat politicians and DC bureaucrats wouldn’t stand for it. I’m sure you think I’m naive, but there is still such a thing as going to far for the American people to swallow.


29 posted on 12/17/2015 3:51:35 PM PST by Hugin ("First thing--get yourself a firearm!" Sheriff Ed Galt, Last Man Standing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SetFree
funny that ben carson should bring this up...

bambi has two choices
he can leave or he can leave

that is all.
30 posted on 12/17/2015 3:54:04 PM PST by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SetFree

Carson is right.

All it would take is a big enough crisis for Obama to declare martial law. Once he does and has had time to implement his order, it would be simple for him to “postpone” the election.

Obama has already given himself ample authority to do everything that would be needed to implement this. He has even built the “domestic army” he talked about prior to his first election (even the NOAA has it’s own SWAT teams now). Obama has poisoned race relations, and primed his “gimmee dat” army to help make sure he gains and keeps control.

The military would NOT stop him. He has already purged the military of those leaders who would be most likely to oppose him.

All Obama needs is the crisis.

Manufacturing a crisis is child’s play. Despots have done so throughout human history.

Those who think “it could never happen here” are living in fantasy land. There is nothing whatsoever to keep Obama from trying and he has put all the pieces in place to do so. So why wouldn’t he?

It’s really easy:
1. Build a support base that will back you.
Done.
2. Purge military leaders who might oppose you.
Done.
3. Manufacture a crisis.
Easy to do.
4. Declare martial law.
All needed authority is in place.
5. Postpone the election.
Child’s play once step 4 is in place.

Voila! President for life! If you’re Obama, what’s not to like?

You say you wouldn’t stand for it? With Homeland “Security” and the NSA’s surveillance technology, finding and disappearing opposition leaders would be child’s play. Absent organization and leadership, what are YOU going to be able to do about it?

Scattered opposition is almost certain, but he could deal with that easily.

If you think this is far fetched you simply have not studied history. Despots have followed this basic approach over and over and over (the Reichstag fire set by Hitler in 1933, for example). It works.

The only difference is that now the technology to suppress opposition is better.


31 posted on 12/17/2015 3:54:24 PM PST by EternalHope (Something wicked this way comes. Be ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rusureitflies?

You’re kidding, yes?

God, I hate public schools..!


32 posted on 12/17/2015 3:54:52 PM PST by Original Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: IronJack

Oh this Patriot will.


33 posted on 12/17/2015 3:55:29 PM PST by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Original Lurker

Lol. My point was, there WAS an election, despite the war of northern aggression. The fact still remains that an election was held. That’s all I was trying to point out. Odumbo, OTOH, would be very likely to stop the election.


34 posted on 12/17/2015 3:56:25 PM PST by dware (Free Survival & Prepper Ebooks: http://www.survivetherockies.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Snark

I wouldn’t be too quick to dismiss the possibility of it happening. The Left hasn’t been zealously working for generations subverting America without a goal in mind.


35 posted on 12/17/2015 3:57:40 PM PST by liberalism is suicide (Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Watch it now. To some, that’s close to blasphemy in these here parts.

There’s a few ‘invalid’ Amendments about that same time too. Real hard to argue, IMO, how a few under duress of, “You want to get out from occupation and join ‘the club’ again...” are in any way valid....


36 posted on 12/17/2015 3:57:49 PM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SetFree

My view is Obama wouldn’t keep at the helm in 2017. He will be extremely powerful and his minions will still be in power but he will not be seen. He knows how bad things are going to get. He knows Iran will be testing nukes soon. He knows we are throttling to a true world war. He does not want his name on any of it. One thing Obama’s massive ego will not allow is responsibility for anything bad.


37 posted on 12/17/2015 3:58:30 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SetFree
Could terrorists in America; Muslim refugees/immigrants; Islamic provocateurs; the provocateurs instigating Black Lives Matter; drug cartels; gangs; progressive/liberal militants; and others knowingly (or unknowingly) work enough chaos in America for the President to willingly declare martial law and suspend the 2016 elections?

He has no authority to suspend elections. Even if he does suspend elections, the Constitution says the state legislatures can appoint electors to the electoral college.

And he still has his term ending in January 2017. No matter what, Obama will not be President past January 2017.

38 posted on 12/17/2015 3:58:50 PM PST by PapaBear3625 (Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkpup
If Obama were to suspend the Constitution, wouldn't that eliminate his office?

Constitution? What's that?


39 posted on 12/17/2015 3:59:09 PM PST by COBOL2Java (I'll vote for Jeb when Terri Schiavo endorses him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Snark
It will never happen. This is tin foil hat talk and I am sort of amazed that Carson, as educated as he is, would go down that rabbit hole. Then again, he has said some goofy stuff in the past.

Right. Just click your heels together and say "There's no place like home...there's no place like home...there's no place like home"

40 posted on 12/17/2015 4:01:00 PM PST by COBOL2Java (I'll vote for Jeb when Terri Schiavo endorses him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson