Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tau Food; Georgia Girl 2

State nullification of unconstitutional federal acts and omissions is alive and well, the latest being states that refuse to accept the invasion the feds refuse to repel in violation of the feds constitutional obligation to “repel invasions” (Art. I, Sec 8.Cl 15).

The fight for freedom isn’t guaranteed to be an easy or bloodless fight, but it is a battle worth fighting and dying for if necessary. The rag-tag colonists were fighting the most powerful nation in the world. What were their chances? But they had two things going for them that made all the difference:

1) Faith in the God of the Bible

2) Bravery and willingness that “with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence”, they mutually pledged “to each other our lives, our Fortunes and our sacred honor.”


48 posted on 11/28/2015 12:28:00 PM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216; Georgia Girl 2
I agree with all that you say, but I think that any progress made in reducing the scope of the federal government is going to be based upon public support for that. And, that day may not be too far off.

The main point of my two prior posts was to dispel the notion that the growth of the federal government is some sort of recent development. The theories which support that growth date to the very beginning of our Republic. And, so people should not underestimate the difficulty in reversing a major historical trend. We need public support.

50 posted on 11/28/2015 12:44:44 PM PST by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson