Video discovery from officer's car implicated in shooting must await 'analysis' - agreement [Waco]
-----------------------------
Need more characters in headline field
1 posted on
11/24/2015 1:34:36 PM PST by
don-o
To: don-o
To: don-o
What the hell?
Six months and there’s been no ‘analysis’ of the police video evidence?
3 posted on
11/24/2015 1:41:59 PM PST by
JJ_Folderol
(Just my opinion and only worth what you paid for it.)
To: don-o
“They say it’s not legal. Under the new rules of discovery, it is unlawful for the State to put any conditions on what will be turned over as evidence or exculpatory evidence.”
Precisely. The DA has no authority to put any conditions on evidence given to the attorney. This is total bullsh!t.
To: don-o
Is this one of the perps, I mean shooters, I mean cops?
7 posted on
11/24/2015 1:49:17 PM PST by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
To: don-o
Not sure why they are withholding the video. It provides irrefutable evidence of organized gang activity by criminals wearing (police) patches.
9 posted on
11/24/2015 1:55:33 PM PST by
PAR35
To: don-o
As stated before, Curiouser and Curiouser
11 posted on
11/24/2015 2:11:24 PM PST by
Tupelo
(Honest men go to Washington, but honest men do not stay in Washington.)
To: don-o
Signed agreement or no, they still have to provide the evidence to the defense lawyers, or there would be a mistrial. So why even argue about signing it? If you don’t want to sign, don’t sign.
To: don-o
A Grand Jury in November cleared he and two other officers of any wrongdoing in the shooting death of a fleeing robbery suspect. What's up with that?
18 posted on
11/26/2015 5:58:08 PM PST by
MileHi
(Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson