Posted on 10/04/2015 10:51:32 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
two words
fat chance
1. He could use a teleprompter
2. Candy Crowley would be the moderator.
0bama is good for the NRA and gun ownership.
Obama would debate under two conditions:
1. He could use a teleprompter
2. Candy Crowley would be the moderator.
3. He would choose the questions for both him and his opponent.
4. He would select the audience.
makes you wonder if barack is getting secret kickbacks from the gun / ammo manufacturers for helping them boost their revenues.
Obama is too much of a pu$$y. Hw would get his a$$ handed to him.
I might be able to support a bill that curtailed some gun ownership rights, provided that bill contained the language that all who vote in favor of the law will be required to surrender their personal arms and will be forever forbidden ownership rights. Anybody who signs that legislation, likewise will surrender any and all personal arms, and will never be able to obtain a firearm and no money from the federal treasury shall be expended to protect that signer in the future.
Obama would lose the debate.
Gun control is a strawman argument that rests upon the easily refutable notion the law will restrain bad guys.
People who are determined to commit murder, no law in the world is going to stop them.
Its that simple. The only way to stop them is with a good person with a gun.
But liberals like Obama and Jonathan Alter have turned this country into a charnel house by stripping Americans of their God-given right to defend themselves.
And my constitutional RKBA is not subject to Obama and Alter’s good grace.
God these people should hear themselves; they’re stupid and they don’t know it.
I wouldn’t like them to inflict their ignorance upon the rest of us.
He could also have a debate on abortion.
I stopped reading right there.
There is nothing "irrefutable" about it!
It's the same mentaldeficient that causes Hussein to overuse the meaningless phrase "It's the right thing to do." Saying it does not make it true or fact.
I also suspect that the number of lives saved by owners of legal private firearms by non felons, will not be mentioned. The number dwarfs overwhelmingly the number of murders committed by thugs, felons and other hoods in possession of illegal firearms.
But the suggestion of a national debate is excellent! But will never happen. There aren't enough teleprompters in the world for that African mental deficient to be able to raise any kind of challenge.
The side that’s losing always wants debates.
And, facing an opponent without much political conviction or desire for the presidency on a narrow range of issues entirely framed, formed, and asked by his handlers and the collaborationist press, and moderated by suckups who barely concealed their partisanship The Chair® still got his ass completely handed to him.
Anyone who thinks Barack 0bama could win a debate against Wayne LaPierre on the RKBA is living in a dream world. 0bama has about 50% of the IQ that people like Jonathan Alter credit him with, but even he is not stupid enough to issue this challenge, and if he is, ValJar is not.
Bring it on.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
Eek!
No comments section on the Daily Beast Site. LOL
Seriously? LaPierre would stomp 0bama’s ass in that debate, and doubly so if loser-in-chief was sans teleprompter. I’d give $20 to see it [but only to the NRA].
I’ve noticed more and more, how comments are disallowed anywhere the left would take heat in general discussion of the article subject at hand.
I rather see Obama debate Ted Nugent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.