Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/28/2015 5:32:52 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

BUNK.

Bring back American manufacturing.


2 posted on 08/28/2015 5:34:02 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

3 posted on 08/28/2015 5:34:04 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (What is the difference between Obama and government bonds? Government bonds will mature someday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Total BS - “goods and services” is not the same as “manufactured goods”. Yes, the shipping and sales might happen here - but no wealth is produced in those steps.

I sell manufacturing equipment for a living - this is pure propaganda.

No one wants to manufacture in the US if they can avoid it. The idiots in DC have made it much too risky.

They can print money - but they can’t print wealth.


8 posted on 08/28/2015 5:40:06 PM PDT by paulk ( If one fails to learn self discipline, Don't worry; there will be others to boss you around. -kps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Funny how American manufacturing declined while China’s increased. Do you think there is a connection?


11 posted on 08/28/2015 5:42:23 PM PDT by amnestynone (Political Correction is a tactic based social intimidation to suppress opposing views.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Then how is it that China poisoned our dogs?

Why can't we buy vitamins made in America?

15 posted on 08/28/2015 5:47:16 PM PDT by donna (Pray for Revival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Several years ago, a Chinese researcher took a sabbatical in the lab where I did my graduate research. For Christmas every year, we would draw names from a hat in order to play Secret Santa.

I drew the Chinese researcher’s name.

I thought it would be nice to get him something strictly American, to remind him of the time he spent working in our lab. I shopped and shopped. Everything was “Made in China.”

I finally settled on buying an item with an American theme and pulling off the “Made in China” sticker before wrapping it. I felt terrible, but what else could I do?


22 posted on 08/28/2015 5:59:30 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Scott Lincicome is an international trade attorney with extensive experience in trade litigation before the United States Department of Commerce, the US International Trade Commission (ITC), the US Court of International Trade, the European Commission and the World Trade Organization's (WTO) Dispute Settlement Body. He has also advised corporate and sovereign clients on US bilateral and regional trade agreements and American trade policy, as well as WTO matters, including accessions, compliance and multilateral trade negotiations.

Outside of the firm, Scott is an Adjunct Scholar with the Cato Institute, where he writes on international economic policy and politics. He also is a Senior Visiting Lecturer at Duke University Law School and a Visiting Lecturer at Duke University, where he teaches courses on international trade law and international trade policy, respectively. -

Gee, this guy sounds like an objective, disinterested observer--not. I am so sick of these guys. Stop pissing on my leg and telling me it is raining.

23 posted on 08/28/2015 6:11:34 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Most of the things I buy are made in China. Nowadays, anything made in the United States has a small American flag on it to alert customers. When was the last time anyone has seen clothing made in the United States, unless you get on the internet and search it out?


24 posted on 08/28/2015 6:31:23 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Obviously, if a pair of sneakers made in China costs $70 in the U.S., not all of that retail price goes to the Chinese manufacturer. In fact, the bulk of the retail price pays for the transportation of the sneakers to the U.S, rent for the store where they are sold, profits for shareholders of the U.S. retailer, and the cost of marketing the sneakers. These costs include the salaries, wages and benefits paid to U.S. workers and managers who staff these operations.

There's nothing surprising or informative about that. It's long been known that the cost of producing sneakers in Asia is just below or above about $10.00 per pair. And the huge mark-ups to $50.00 to $200.00 or more per pair cover very high marketing expense paid to athletes and sports teams that use particular brands, and to profit.

What the above actually supports is that only a few Americans benefit from profits made from many of the industries largely relocated from the US to cheap labor nations.

Counting the expenses and profits realized on imported goods in the US as the US portion of income from imports is total BS. You could up with similar ratios for goods produced in the US and then distributed to the final sales point. - We have the hundreds of billions in trade deficits valued at fairly low productions costs of imports, but the deficits still total hundreds of billions which is indicative of how many millions of manufacturing jobs have been relocated from the US.

And these productivity stats are mostly likely from the same old bogus productivity stats calculated on manufacturing still done in the US, and then compared to previous eras when the more labor intensive, and lower productivity industries were still in the US and part of prior years productivity calculations. Much of it is not real productivity gains, but merely shedding the more labor intensive and lower productivity manufacturing from the calculation.

This 'study' looks like a bunch of contorted BS designed to yield the desired conclusion

Where does this writer account for the $1 trillion spent annually on means tested government poverty programs, going largely to welfare recipients and the unemployed and marginally employed? That's the real "benefits" of shedding millions of manufacturing jobs and being left with an economy which has no jobs for millions of people.

29 posted on 08/28/2015 7:00:49 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The China threat to American industry consists in the extraordinarily high American tax on business and the ever proliferating and already onerous regulation of American industry all of which is rapidly pricing American industry out of the market or out of the USA.


31 posted on 08/28/2015 8:33:43 PM PDT by arthurus (It's true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

A Krugman grad?


33 posted on 08/29/2015 12:38:01 AM PDT by This_far (WHAT LAWS DO WE GET TO IGNORE?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson