Yeah. THAT tolerant group.
Here's some famous "Tolerance" photos from back then, you remember:
Posted on 08/25/2015 4:05:48 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony
Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing may be an attempt to create balanced living patterns. Rather than remove discrimination, AFFH leverages it to codify oppression
Local rule died in America on July 8, 2015. With it passes the rights of rural and suburban communities to decide their own futures. The trigger was the final 377-page ruling from HUD called Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing[ia] that attempts to remove discrimination and achieve balanced and integrated living patterns.
As one blogger beams, “What could possibly be wrong with helping low-income families to move into better neighborhoods?” In this case, everything.
AFFH is reminiscent of the old cartoon character Elmer Fudd, who used his shotgun to abolish an annoying fly. He blew up furniture, broke windows and destroyed his home, while the fly happily buzzed away. Like Elmer, AFFH leaves a destructive wake and does little to solve the problem.
Another govt program doomed to fail before it even starts.
Ain’t no ‘Publicans talking about this.
Basically they are saying that if you don’t have enough non-whites in your town to satisfy the Rat Party and elect their criminals, they will import some so that you will then have an Acceptably Racially Mixed town.
IOW, can’t run Whitey: we gonna follow you and embed the official Victim Classes with you to make sure you can’t ever be a majority anywhere.
Oddly, this won’t be happening to majority Black, Mexican or Asian places.
That would be Evil Discrimination, bringing in de debbil White man.
Once again, tell me how the Constitution mandates this?
Guess we’ll have to have “Justice” Kennedy lecture us.
Force me to live near scum and I’m leaving the country.
“Integration” the new word for slavery the Democrats uses on black neighborhoods.
It was tried in primitive form in the ‘70s.
It was called “busing”.
Big hit in South Boston. As in, lotta people hitting each other over it.
That scared the crap outta the Kennedy’s. Po white Irish didn’t like it one bit, might have taken it out on The Swimmer.
You mean those "tolerant" Northerners had a problem going to school with black kids?
Yeah. THAT tolerant group.
Here's some famous "Tolerance" photos from back then, you remember:
As long as it transfers yet more power to the Federal Government, it has succeeded.
If you won’t move to the ghetto, they’ll move the ghetto to you.
Funny thing, that, seeing as I lived considerably south of there. The folks in Boston were still burning buses to keep their kids from having to go to school with 'those people', after Northeastern liberals had imposed the same on us over 7 years before.
That was part of my introduction to 'Rules for thee, but not for me.'
This law needs to be overturned on 1/20/2017 just after Trump takes the oath of office.
I never liked Romney. I couldn’t support Romney. But those conservatives who sat out the 2012 election because Romney was the candidate should perhaps ponder this: A President Romney never would have dreamed of ordering HUD to do something as wrong as this.
Disclaimer: I myself am one of those conservatives who just couldn’t support Romney, even after he got the nomination. Looking back, I think I might have been wrong about that.
Said it better then I could.
It isn’t a law.
Nobody in Congress voted on it, so no one can be dis-elected because of it.
It’s a regulation written by Julian Castro’s bureaucrats.
Which has the force of law simply because willful violation of it is a crime.
So functionally, it has the same weight as law. Except it isn’t, unless they say it is.
Got it?
You can thank FDR for this abomination.
Everything. Nobody is entitled to live anywhere they please. Nobody.
Anyone is equally entitled to live anywhere they please. The trick is being pleased to live in a place one can afford.
Must be the blue eyes ...
Cleveland guy...my mom (RIP) went to hs with him.
Wrong. You are not entitled to live anywhere you want. Entitled means you are owed it, you deserve it. You do not. You have to earn it, by buying it. And you have to buy it at a price you do not get to set. You can haggle but it aint the same thing. You also cannot live somewhere that is not for sale.
Many reasons why people are not entitled to live anywhere they want.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.