This has to be the dumbest argument to justify PP’s agenda to date.
Do clinics that perform IVF have to destroy embryos? Probably. These types if things DO have a limited timeframe for chances of success.
And when a woman ovulates once a month, what happens to those eggs if they aren’ t fertilized? Does that make a woman a monthly abortion muderer?
The differerence between IVF and abortion is that with IVF, the woman is TRYING to become pregnant, and HOPING that baby will make it to full term.
Abortion is the exact opposite.
> “Both IVF and abortion involve the destruction of fertilized eggs that could potentially develop into people”.
False premise.
IVF is a procedure to help a woman have a baby, to fertilize a woman’s egg(s) outside her body. There is ***never intent*** to destroy the fertilized egg. If the procedure results in destroyed eggs, that’s the fault of the technology and procedure.
Whereas abortion is the ***intentional*** deliberate destruction of a fertized egg, a fetus, a child, a baby.
The two, IVF and Abortion are not comparable even if the results can be the same. It would like comparing the deliberate murder of a human being with the accidental death of a human being by car accident. Murder and car accidents result in deaths but they are not the same.
This statement is false. Both IVF and abortion involve the destruction of fertilized eggs that could potentially develop into \are in fact/ people.
Actually we have been opposed to this too. Their ignorance is showing.
For later....